Hi,
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 12:48:16AM +0100, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> I do know coding and am interested in fixing the bug myself, as long as
> I get some idea about how to proceed (getting to know the whole sane
> project structure just for a little bug is a bit much, I just want to
> use m
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:45:51PM -0700, t takahashi wrote:
> Oops, of course I meant to ask if you were suggesting this:
>
>while adf-is-full-p
>do
> sleep 10
> scanimage ... --batch-count 1 ... > ...
>done
Try something like this:
c
Hi all. Please excuse if off-topic.
I'm planning to buy a two-sided and afd scanner for linux. I have seen
the HP Scanjet 5990.
Could anybody help me anyway?
Thanks in advance,
-Eduardo
"Juliane Clausen" wrote:
Hi,
> thank you, it took me a lot of time to get it running (with kernel
> 2.6.x) but now it works with a startup script that changes the
> user-rights:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> cd /proc/bus/usb/
> find -type f -exec chown root:scanner {} \;
> find -type f -exec chmod 664 {} \;
>
Hi,
> Yes. However, scanning at 2400 DPI will give you an unusable image at
> the moment.
thank you, it took me a lot of time to get it running (with kernel
2.6.x) but now it works with a startup script that changes the
user-rights:
#!/bin/sh
cd /proc/bus/usb/
find -type f -exec chown root:scann
Am Don, 2004-11-18 um 06.09 schrieb Frank Zago:
> Oliver Rauch wrote:
> > Am Mit, 2004-11-17 um 20.58 schrieb fz...@austin.rr.com:
> >
> >>>Hello Frank.
> >>>
> >>>I am not a fan of this patch.
> >>>I think it will work but I think it is a hack.
> >>>
> >>>It seems that only a few backends have pr
Hello Dave,
> ... do you use JNI to communicate with sane, or is Morena pure java
> (not sure how it could be, but I thought I'd ask)?
In case of SANE, Morena is pure Java. In case of Twain, it is necessary
to use jni library.
> Will Morena 6.2 be free software?
Morena has free of charge e
Has anyone got XPA/transparent scanning working with HP 7400c?
It seems like a bug to me: The XPA unit turns itself on and the scanner
head moves into calibration position. Then it locks up.
All I found when googling was references to a bug regarding which
offsets the scanner uses for coordinates
