Hi,
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 04:48:51PM +0100, Tom Schutzer-Weissmann wrote:
> I had problems using the Epkowa libraries (libsane-epkowa) and the
> iscan frontend with my usb scanner in kernel 2.6.
> The scanner was closed after each operation. Once closed, nothing
> could be read from it, and I
--=-LXWa6OL6bN8i+5klQC12
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hate when I do that . . here's the xsane logs described in my previous
email
--=-LXWa6OL6bN8i+5klQC12
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=xsane_previewscan_regscan_die_log.txt.gz
Content-Type: application/x-g
Very right . . must have had a typo in the command line.
I re-did my tests.
First test: used xsane to do a remote full scan and quit. Everything
worked fine. gzipped log: xsane_regscan_quit_log.txt.gz
2nd test: used xsane to do a remote preview scan then attempt a regular
scan once the preview
Hi Henning,
here's a copy of the email I sent to the maintainer of the fb630u backend.
It gives the full debug output, the last lines where it blocks being the
same as those I already posted on this list.
I got no reply from Nathan so I have nothing more to contriute from him.
As you can see
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 03:40:39PM +0200, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> So, what is the final word about this "timeout" problem?
The reason is unknown as of now. It's not that easy as these timeouts
may have several reason. Every wrong command that's sent to the
scanner can cause timeouts.
It doe
I had problems using the Epkowa libraries (libsane-epkowa) and the iscan
frontend with my usb scanner in kernel 2.6.
The scanner was closed after each operation. Once closed, nothing could be read
from it, and I got lots of BULK TIMEOUTs, although there were no errors when
the device was reopen
Hello.
So, what is the final word about this "timeout" problem?
Is it caused by the "uhci" driver? The one I must use, according to the
following:
Jun 9 13:06:27 dawn kernel: usb usb2: Product: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (#2)
Jun 9 13:06:27 dawn kernel: usb usb2: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.5+g6 u
> Connection refused means that saned isn't running
yeah, that's what i said ;-)
> on the server or (x)inetd isn't configured correctly
this was the point.
i didn't expect that in a new (knoppix hd-installed) system there's no inet=
d running.
maybe i pressed the wrong buttons thru the install
Hi,
I think, you'd better try to change the permission for this device in =
the /etc/security/console.perms file. Change your previous scanner line =
with this :
0660 0660 root.scan_group
Then add user to scan_group group (or whatever_group_you_want) to enable =
access to the scanner.
Als
Hi Fran=E7ois,
Fran=E7ois Patte said:
> I am facing a big problem with xsane from fedora C1. (xsane-0.91-1):
>=20
> 1- I have a scanner Nikon LS-2000. The first person who ran=20
> xsane was not=3D
> root
> and it now impossible to change the owner and right of the=20
> device /dev/sg0.
I have j
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--_=_NextPart_000_01C44E18.95B7D150
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi all,
I know that some people were asking about a Java SANE AP
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 10:08:32AM +0200, François Patte wrote:
> I am facing a big problem with xsane from fedora C1. (xsane-0.91-1):
>
> 1- I have a scanner Nikon LS-2000. The first person who ran xsane was not root
> and it now impossible to change the owner and right of the device /dev/sg
Bonjour,
I am facing a big problem with xsane from fedora C1. (xsane-0.91-1):
1- I have a scanner Nikon LS-2000. The first person who ran xsane was not=
root
and it now impossible to change the owner and right of the device /dev/sg=
0.
This device has been set with owner didier and group root w
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:26:58AM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> I am running FC2 and want to upgrade xsane and sane-?ends to latest
> level, but being new to linux I am unsure of how I should do this.
>
> Since they exist as rpm installed packages should they then be removed
> from the syst
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:17:36PM -0700, Allan Kaplan wrote:
> As far as "sane-find-scanner" goes, am I to assume that I have to be running
> Linux, or can I use the Terminal program on the Mac and do this in Unix?
MacOS X is ok. Any system that runs SANE should work.
> And can I further as
I am running FC2 and want to upgrade xsane and sane-?ends to latest
level, but being new to linux I am unsure of how I should do this.
Since they exist as rpm installed packages should they then be removed
from the system before installation or is it safe to let them stay and
install the new leve
16 matches
Mail list logo
