[sane-devel] hp officejet support

2004-04-12 Thread Peter Kirchgessner
Hi, scanning and printing are different stuff. So if there is a new printer driver I see no need to change the scanner drivers. And I am quite sure that the hpoj-backend is still better in supporting the Office Jet/MFPs for scanning than the hp-backend was. Sincerely Peter Fetka Mario schrieb

[sane-devel] hp officejet support

2004-04-12 Thread Till Kamppeter
HPOJ is not given up. There will be done bigger changes on its architecture to support more functionality than currently. Therefore there is a longer time without releases. HPIJS is only a filter to convert PostScript (with the help of GhostScript) to PCL or LIDIL. It has nothing to do with bri

[sane-devel] Re: canoscan 5500F driver ?

2004-04-12 Thread Thibault North
Sorry I did a simple reply :( I am going to try that, as well as I understood it :) else I'll ask you more questions... Thank a lot for your help, Thibault Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: >Hi, > >On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 05:08:27PM +0200, Thibault North wrote: > > >>ok let's go for a test. But I'a

[sane-devel] Re: canoscan 5500F driver ?

2004-04-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 05:08:27PM +0200, Thibault North wrote: > ok let's go for a test. But I'am beginning, don't go to quickly :) Ok. First: reply to the sane-devel mailing list, not to me personally :-) > You are talking of check-usb-chip.c in sane-backend 1.4pre tools directory ? Yes.

[sane-devel] Re: canoscan 5500F driver ?

2004-04-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 06:40:05PM +0200, Thibault North wrote: > I already sent an email about that scanner, because I wanted to write a > driver for it. Unfortunately, I don't really have time now (exams) and I > absolutely don't know how to write that driver. As this scanner is reported

[sane-devel] Feature freeze for sane-backend 1.0.14

2004-04-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 02:24:09PM +0200, Rene Rebe wrote: > Sorry for my ongoing lack of time to read all lists ... :-( And so I > missed the feature freeze here ... > > I should not commit my accumulated changes for the Avision backend > which are now in a state I could commit them again (b

[sane-devel] problem in compiling on cygwin

2004-04-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:01:26AM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > So I installed gcc-g++ to make CC act as a C++ compiler (since it is a > frontend that call cc1plus from gcc-c++ package). > > Now, when your configure script run, it find CC and test if it is a C++ > compiler and the test succ

[sane-devel] Interested in writing a driver for...

2004-04-12 Thread Greg Apessos
my Ezonics EZCam USB III webcam. What got me interested was finding a reference to the EZCam USB II not being supported on the sane-project's site, http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/biolux-654.html. While it isn't a scanner, maybe my work could be useful to someone else. But the difficulty

[sane-devel] Feature freeze for sane-backend 1.0.14

2004-04-12 Thread Rene Rebe
Hi, On: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:12:42 +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Hi, > = > On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 09:25:18PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote= : > > Feature freeze for sane-backends 1.0.14 is now active. That means, > > that now new backend or new features for existing backends sho

[sane-devel] Feature freeze for sane-backend 1.0.14

2004-04-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 09:25:18PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Feature freeze for sane-backends 1.0.14 is now active. That means, > that now new backend or new features for existing backends should be > committed to CVS. Bug fixes, documentation and translation updates are > ok. The

[sane-devel] Feature freeze for sane-backend 1.0.14

2004-04-12 Thread Thomas Frayne
Rene, If you want to test these changes and sneak them into CVS, please send them to me. I'll try them on my HP Scanjet 7450C, and let you know the results. Tom On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 05:34, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 02:24:09PM +0200, Rene Rebe wrote: > >