On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:02:41PM -0200, CARLOS EDUARDO DANTAS DE MENEZES
wrote:
> Julien,
>
> I read in some documentation that the correct seting of parport is EPP. I
> tested it with others options but also my scanner wasn't recognized (none
> error messages were appeared too).
> How could
Julien,
I read in some documentation that the correct seting of parport is EPP. =
I tested it with others options but also my scanner wasn't recognized =
(none error messages were appeared too).
How could I isolate the problem?
Thanks,
Menezes
-Original Message-
From: Julien BLACHE [
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:04:55AM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "CARLOS EDUARDO DANTAS DE MENEZES" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > [umax_pp_low] Found 0xFF expected 0x00 (umax_pp_low.c:5002)
>
> > [umax_pp_low] Found 0x11 expected 0x00 (umax_pp_low.c:5002)
>
> > # dmesg | grep parport
> > parport0: PC
"CARLOS EDUARDO DANTAS DE MENEZES" wrote:
Hi,
> [umax_pp_low] Found 0xFF expected 0x00 (umax_pp_low.c:5002)
> [umax_pp_low] Found 0x11 expected 0x00 (umax_pp_low.c:5002)
> # dmesg | grep parport
> parport0: PC-style at 0x378 [PCSPP,TRISTATE,EPP]
> lp0: using parport0 (polling).
>
> Any suges