> This thread looks somewhat open-ended.As I am suffering from the same
> problems,
> I'd like to ask whether a solution has been found or the demand for
> debug-output
> is still valid.(Even with 90 dpi it is far too large to post it.)
What exactly was the problem? It's been a while since the l
I've updated my port of sane to windows. It works fine with 2 of my scsi
scanners. I'd like to integrate it. Can someone review the code?
http://www.zago.net/sane/windows/sane_on_windows.html
Frank.
> now, i tried "scanimage -mode Color -b" but on a flatbed scanner that
> scans the same image over and over. next i tried the same thing w/o
> the -b, but that scans the entire bed. besides, xsane offers a slew of
> options on bit depth, limiting the scan area, etc that i can't seem to
> set wit
--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:45:22PM +0100, kevin lyda wrote:
> so... do i have to learn libsane to do the scanimage line above or does
> such an animal exist? woul
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
i swear there's a question here. it's about batch scanning, but first i
have to ramble on about why...
i recently bought a packard bell scanner. yes, i know "
