Major A schrieb:
> The SANE API is designed to be simple and portable, and any change
> towards object orientation or functional programming would only bloat
> it unnecessarily. Sorry, if you want to interface Scheme to SANE,
> you'll have to adapt to the way things are.
Well, changing the curren
> I don't think that network transparency introduces a problem for "user
> data" pointer sizes. Since Sane itself does not deal with this pointer,
> the net backend does not need to send and receive the correct value of
> this pointer to/from the Sane server. Instead, the net backend can use
>
Henning,
I have a UMAX 4500 sitting on my desk lying unused since I moved to Red
Hat 4 months ago, can I be of any help here in obtaining any logs or
anything ?
Regards,
Stu Hirons
On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 13:54, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 02:38:36PM +0200, Ja
Thank you all for your input. I do understand (and expected) the responses I
got. I probably should have included some
sample source code to support and clarify my suggestion. For those who are
interested, a summary of some cross language
issues can be found at http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/aut
