Hi,
though I'm the maintainer of the microtek2 backend I cannot help you much with
the SCSI-over-USB stuff. But Oliver Neukum
has done the linux 'microtek' kernel
module and I think he can give you some useful hints if you ask him.
Regards,
Karsten
On Friday 06 June 2003 18:53, Henning Meie
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 06:42:08 +0100
"F J Brooks" wrote:
> No, I found that I also had sane-backends-1.0.8 [the original which
> came with my SuSE distribution]. So I removed it (using YaST2).
> That's when things got even worse!
Did you install sane and xsane using YaST2 or from source? Often the
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 11:45:56AM +0200, Thomas Soumarmon wrote:
> My problem is more the .tar.gz packages I installed and tested, and also the
> different kernels (2.4.19, 2.4.20 to 2.5.?? ).
The kernels don't install anything in /usr/include. Well, at least
they shouldn't. What may be a p
I've been compiling sane-backends-1.0.12 on various Mac OS X system
without any problem. I did compile libusb using the patch file Mattias
sent me. The sm3600 backend should not be an issue. --Dino
On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 06:25 AM,
sane-devel-requ...@www.mostang.com wrote:
> some time a
Hi Henning,
>
> Kernel version 2.4.21 is not released yet and the pre versions don't
> have that file. Anyway, kernel headers shouldn't be used from
> userspace. So it's probably from glibc. I'm just wondering why it's
> not on my system, I'm using the same version of glibc.
>
> > I am wondering i
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:17:41AM +0200, Thomas Soumarmon wrote:
> > Where did you get videodev2.h from? Is it from your version of libc
> > (which one)? Or is /usr/include/linux a link to
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux and you have installed a 2.5 kernel?
>
> Looking with the rpmdrake too
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 03:12:41PM -0700, Sergey Berezin wrote:
> I recently acquired Canon CanoScan 8000F (USB 2.0), which is not
> supported by SANE yet, and I'm thinking of writing a backend for it.
> Or at least try to reverse-engineer the protocol...
Very good! Have you looked at the SAN
Hi,
someone ("Josef") provided a Czech sane-backends translation. If there are
no objections, I'll add it to CVS this evening or tomorrow morning. If
someone else is also working on a Czech translation, please let me know.
Thanks
Michael
On Sat, 31 May 2003 09:15:11 +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz
wrote:
> So an older version of xsane works? The current version is 0.91, by
> the way.
Is there any advantage to me in installing xsane 0.91, eg, will it solve my
current problems? I installed v.0.90 only two or three weeks ago (when it
w
