Hi,
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:18:54PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> There has been some criticism of the current handling of the :status
> keywords in the .desc files. These filse are used to create our lists
> of scanners and the output of the scanner search engine.
Ok. I wrote some mor
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 05:43:45PM +0200, Thomas Soumarmon wrote:
> I have a problem compiling v4l because of the linux/videodev.h.
> Has anybody already had this problem with this file ?
No, but I haven't installed Video for Linux version 2 (the header is
from version 2).
> Follows the erro
Hi,
I have a problem compiling v4l because of the linux/videodev.h.
Has anybody already had this problem with this file ?
Follows the errors :
In file included from /usr/include/linux/videodev.h:14,
from v4l.c:76:
/usr/include/linux/videodev2.h:432: parse error before "v4l2_std
Hi,
I tested it with BACKENDS="hp5400" and it works great. It is nice to be able
to compile only one backend without changing Makefile.in.
I still have a problem compiling linux/videodev.h that prevents me from
compiling v4l. I send another mail to talk about it.
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:46:55AM +0100, david stevenson wrote:
[backend status]
> Many backends support several scanners, and may be "supported" for most and
> under "development" for some.
> Is unmaintained and supported enough without the 3rd option?
I think so, yes. So a boolean flag
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 01:46:56PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz waffled thusly:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:16:05PM +1000, Michael Fleming wrote:
> > I can confirm it now works with my Genius ColorPage Vivid 3XE (USB)
> > using libusb 0.1.6 and sane-backends 1.0.12 (on Redhat 9, hand-roll
Here are 2 personal opinions
On Friday 06 June 2003 7:18 pm, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:>
> There has been some criticism of the current handling of the :status
> keywords in the .desc files. These filse are used to create our lists
> of scanners and the output of the scanner search engine.
>
> W
