[sane-devel] gamma table value

2003-05-16 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 05:55:20PM +0100, F J Brooks wrote: > >export SANE_DEBUG_AVISION=7 > >scanimage -L > >scanimage -l 5mm -t 5mm -x 15mm -y 15mm > scanner-name.png > > Right, so I ran these commands - both as root and as user - as I didn't know > which you wanted. These are extracts fro

[sane-devel] opticpro9636 T

2003-05-16 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, I can't really help you so I'm forwarding your answer to the mailing list again. Please respond to the list, not the author. On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 11:25:44AM -0400, Ernie Schroder wrote: > > > > The device node for the pt_drv in /dev does exist and the user > > > > has access permissions fo

[sane-devel] gamma table value

2003-05-16 Thread
On Thursday, May 15, 2003 "Rene Rebe" wrote: >When you have read all this documents, why havent't you contacted the >Avision backend author (me) or choosed a subject for your mail which >I can easily pick up ("gamma table values" -> "avision backend does >not work properly"). I do not have the ti

[sane-devel] Spot ScanTak 2c/3c

2003-05-16 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 01:16:07PM +0300, Alex wrote: > I have detected on this address an error: a name of the scanner ScanTak > 2c (instead of ScanTek), manufacturer Spot Technology. Thanks. I'll fix this. Bye, Henning

[sane-devel] Spot ScanTak 2c/3c

2003-05-16 Thread Alex
Hi, I have detected on this address an error: a name of the scanner ScanTak 2c (instead of ScanTek), manufacturer Spot Technology. Regards Alex (Oleksiy O. Loktev). 16.05.03 11:56:18, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: >Hi, > >On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 09:33:55AM +0300, Alex wrote: >> Inform me, ple

[sane-devel] Spot ScanTak 2c/3c

2003-05-16 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 09:33:55AM +0300, Alex wrote: > Inform me, please, that I should to you inform on the scanner Spot > ScanTak 2c. I hope, that my information will for many be useful, and > also, that a series of these scanners will be not long in the list not > supported SANE. Well,

[sane-devel] Progress on CanoScan D1250U2

2003-05-16 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:54:19AM +0300, wg wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:56:51PM +0200, norbert lataille wrote: > > - reversing the windows TWAIN DLL > > Is it possible write backend to unsupported scaner with this thing, such > as Mustek 9636P? Can you tell us more about this scann

[sane-devel] Spot ScanTak 2c/3c

2003-05-16 Thread Alex
Respected Henning! Inform me, please, that I should to you inform on the scanner Spot ScanTak 2c. I hope, that my information will for many be useful, and also, that a series of these scanners will be not long in the list not supported SANE. I wait for your answer. Regards Alex (Oleksiy O. Lok

[sane-devel] Spot ScanTak 2c/3c

2003-05-16 Thread Thomas VIAL
Hi Alex, Just a quick note to say that no guarantee can be given as to when a new driver/backend will be available! I shouldn't be wrong in saying that everybody working on those various projects are doing this in their spare time... Thomas --- Alex a écrit : > Respected Henning! > > Inform

[sane-devel] sane and hp scanjet 3400c

2003-05-16 Thread Subash Jeyan
hi, i am new to this list. have a hp scanjet 3400c working using sane 1.0.11 and xsane .90 under mdk 9.1. a problem with scanning: whether colour or grey scale i get this dark horizontal bands in the scans. anybody else seen this before or know what to do about it? thanks and regards, subash.

[sane-devel] opticpro9636 T

2003-05-16 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
Hi, as you're using the 0.40version with SANE-backends 1.0.9, I expect a version conflict! Use the latest module 0.42. Simply unpack this one, recompile, reinstall and reload it, then the old = one will be removed automatically... Gerhard On Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2003 23:39, Ernie Schroder wrote:

[sane-devel] Progress on CanoScan D1250U2

2003-05-16 Thread wg
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:56:51PM +0200, norbert lataille wrote: > This is great, despite I don't know if we are far enough for parallel > tasking right now. Anyway, do you have a DSL line (and are you ready to > receive huge transaction logs) ? Basically I am: > - reversing the windows TWAIN DLL