[sane-devel] DLL backend doesn't work on 680x0 machines

On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 08:09:22PM -0500, Dave Huang wrote: > used the net backend. That all worked fine, but scanimage -h from a > remote machine causes saned on the m68k machine to crash trying to > write to a null pointer when scanimage gets the list of options... > here's the end of the log

[sane-devel] Gradually increasing scan times

Hi, Karl O. Pinc schrieb: > > So, I've installed the sane-backend and sane-frontend 1.0.11 (rpm > release 1) > rpms uploaded by T. Ribbrock to Redhat's site. (I couldn't compile them > without installing too many dependencies.) And recompiled and installed > the > xsane 0.90 (rpm release 1)

[sane-devel] DLL backend doesn't work on 680x0 machines

> > I never was very good with declaring pointers to functions; it's > > possible that I have some misplaced parentheses or something. > > Same here. Maybe one of the other developers has a better idea :-) Me too, but I once met a man who had the magic. His advice was use #typedef then you do no

[sane-devel] DLL backend doesn't work on 680x0 machines

On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 01:51:11PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > But this is with "./configure --enable-warnings", the default setting > in the CVS version of SANE. Ah, okay... I used --enable-warnings and see the warnings now :) It's complaining about the casts not having a full prototype

[sane-devel] Mustek Paragon 600 II N and OpenBSD 3.2 problems

Hi, On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 01:56:36PM +0200, rabbit wrote: > That's what fails indeed, because there isn't a /dev/io on OpenBSD. So if > I understand correctly, this piece of code should give the program access > to i/o ports, which can then be written to using the inb and outb > functions? (I ca

[sane-devel] Epson Perfection 1260/plustek problems (was: Problems problems problems)

I use Xsane to scan. It's the time to get a scan, each time. When I push the button scan or aquire pre-scan it takes about 20/30 seconds before something happens, then i first hear a low 'grunting' noise (as if the motor tries to move in the wrong direction) then a few clicks and the scan strats mo

[sane-devel] DLL backend doesn't work on 680x0 machines

Hi, On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 02:58:19PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: > We still have this old (2 years and 146 days) Debian bug report : > You are right. That bug may be caused by the address/data register problem. > If there is some kind of fix available, I could ge

[sane-devel] DLL backend doesn't work on 680x0 machines

Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: Hi, >> I've been using an old (68k) Mac running NetBSD as my scanning machine, >> and ever since upgrading it to NetBSD 1.6, SANE quit working--it says >> that it can't find any scanners. > > Is this 68k-specific? I'm surprised that nobody else has reported this > pr

[sane-devel] Gradually increasing scan times

Karl O. Pinc wrote: > So, I've installed the sane-backend and sane-frontend 1.0.11 (rpm > release 1) > rpms uploaded by T. Ribbrock to Redhat's site. (I couldn't compile them > without installing too many dependencies.) And recompiled and installed > the > xsane 0.90 (rpm release 1) rpm. (I c

[sane-devel] Problems with CX-3200

--Boundary-00=_X3Z8ANUE2RKD42CK7TS8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 12 April 2003 03:54 am, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 01:27:07PM -0600, Tyler Montbriand wrote: > > Update: xsa

[sane-devel] Mustek Paragon 600 II N and OpenBSD 3.2 problems

On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Hi, > > > > Does the access to i/o ports work in OpenBSD like in FreeBSD? I should've looked further, and indeed, i/o ports are handled differently in OpenBSD. I guess that explains why it didn't work ;) > > > Looks like this code in sanei_ab

[sane-devel] DLL backend doesn't work on 680x0 machines

Hi, On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 06:14:03AM -0500, Dave Huang wrote: > > It works (at least on Linux/i386). But I'm getting a warning for all > > the lines you changed: > > > > dll.c: In function init': > > dll.c:484: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype > > > > Is the warning ok or should

[sane-devel] DLL backend doesn't work on 680x0 machines

Hi, On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 06:33:13PM -0500, Dave Huang wrote: > I've been using an old (68k) Mac running NetBSD as my scanning machine, > and ever since upgrading it to NetBSD 1.6, SANE quit working--it says > that it can't find any scanners. Is this 68k-specific? I'm surprised that nobody else

[sane-devel] hp scanjet 3570c

Hi, On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 08:32:35AM +0200, Davide Tacchella wrote: > For information, I've started collecting information and links about HP > Scanjet 3530,3570. Cool. I'll add your page to the SANE scanner lists. Bye, Henning

[sane-devel] Problems with CX-3200

Hi, On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 01:27:07PM -0600, Tyler Montbriand wrote: > Update: xsane has now begun segfaulting immediately upon run! Log file > reveals it is crashing immediately after sane_open(/dev/usb/scanner0). It > makes no sense at all; it was just working a little while ago. If you

[sane-devel] Epson Perfection 1260/plustek problems (was: Problems problems problems)

Hi, On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 10:13:30AM +0200, Steven Lobbezoo wrote: > In the mean time i installed Suse 8.2 with sane 1.10. > All is well now. The scanner works now, but startup > is EXTREMELY slow. Can you explain this in more detail? Does the detection of devices take long? Or the first scan?

[sane-devel] Problems problems problems

Hi, In the mean time i installed Suse 8.2 with sane 1.10. All is well now. The scanner works now, but startup is EXTREMELY slow. I suppose that's because it's a first release of this=20 combination driver/scanner ? Thanks a lot anyway for your help, Steven Le Mercredi 2 Avril 2003 13:10, Gerha

[sane-devel] hp scanjet 3570c

Hi, For information, I've started collecting information and links about HP Scanjet 3530,3570. Now I'm trying to replay the info collected from USBsnoop. Here is the link. http://www.cscs.ch/~tack/hp3530.html Davide

[sane-devel] DLL backend doesn't work on 680x0 machines

On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 12:42:11PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Is this 68k-specific? I'm surprised that nobody else has reported this > problem. I think any platform that has a different method of returning pointers and integers would have the problem... I don't know of any besides 68k t

[sane-devel] Gradually increasing scan times

On 2003.04.11 11:57 Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > I have no experience with your scanner but maybe the comments help > nevertheless. Yes, thanks to everybody who responded. It is a SMP system. I've tried scanimage and see the same problems. 'modprobe sg' prior to starting xsane gets rid of t