Hi Karsten,
Am Mon, 2003-02-10 um 23.07 schrieb Karsten Festag:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Is it a SCSI or USB (or parport?) scannner, if SCSI: what adapter card
?
SCSI with Adaptec AHA2940
> What SANE version do you use?
Seems to be 1.0.7 SuSE
> could you please send me a logfile (look into the san
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 08:44:06PM -0500, Peter Santoro wrote:
> I'm looking for recommendations on fast/reliable sane-ready scanners
> which have a reliable (ie. doesn't jam often) ADF (auto document
> feeder). Previous postings tend to indicate that what I'm looking for
We have a bunch of Fu
Hi,
The SANE webserver (www.mostang.com) doesn't respond currently
(connection refused). Mail service is running however. The admin has
been notified.
Here are some more or less important links that should work for the
meantime:
Search engines, daily snapshot:
http://sane.informatik.uni-freiburg
>
>
> No, but I was not able to put much time into Sane lately. The job that
> pays for all my Sane development is pretty demanding right now, I don't
> expect this to change in the next few weeks (should get better in March).
>
> Karl Heinz
>
no problem, i'm in my 'exam time' right now and u
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--060806010404040009080508
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Attached is a patch file which can be applied to sane-backends-1.0.11.
It adds support for the Fujitsu fi-4220C flatbed/
Hello,
I am useing xsane .90 on Red Hat 7.3.
I searched the archives and mostly found 1999 postings on ADF. I also found
some postings on film scanners which seemed to lead to the batch scan feature.
The issue I am dealing with is:
I am 99% sure that in an earlier version of xsane that ther
Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:16:41AM -0500, k...@khk.net wrote:
>
>>>Maybe the backend author has more ideas :-)
>>>
>>No, not really... But mostly because I don't have a working net configuratio
>>right now. I'll should be able to debug this over the weekend.
>>
>
> I
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:53:11PM -0800, Ricky Charlet wrote:
> I cannot get sane to work in my environment (mac osx(Jaguar
> 10.2.3/darwin Kernel 6.3), sane-backends-1.0.10, libusb-0.1.7 and an
> epson perfection 636 scanner.
>
> What happens is that (with either scanimage or
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:37:25PM -0800, Michael Laajanen wrote:
> I have a Redhat 8.0 installation and a USB connected scanner from
> Canon, CanoScan D646U which I can not make work.
I can't find this scanner in our lists. I'm not sure if it's supported
at all.
> I have tried the Redhat pr
Lars Täuber said:
>
>
> Karl Heinz Kremer wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:16:41AM -0500, k...@khk.net wrote:
>>
Maybe the backend author has more ideas :-)
>>>No, not really... But mostly because I don't have a working net
>>> configuratio right now. I'll should be able to debug thi
Henning Meier-Geinitz said:
[ ... ]
>> o What reports of success with the sane-epson backend with perfection
>>
>> 6363 have been made?
I run into the same problems with my system. I suspect that this is a
problem with libusb. I can communicate with the scanner to setup a
scan operation (that me
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14:30:29 +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz
> said:
Henning> Hi, The SANE webserver (www.mostang.com) doesn't respond
Henning> currently (connection refused). Mail service is running
Henning> however. The admin has been notified.
It's back up now (it was operator e
12 matches
Mail list logo
