[sane-devel] Canon Lide30: success!

2003-01-30 Thread Till Kamppeter
David Faure wrote: > > The most annoying thing for end users is that the /dev devices don't exist > (on a Mandrake 9.0), I had to mknod for /dev/pt_drv and /dev/usbscanner... > But really: great job. I was not expecting the usb scanner to be supported > yet :) > You don't need to create /dev/usb

[sane-devel] Canon Lide30: success!

2003-01-30 Thread scott fagg
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > Hi, > > On Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2003 12:53, David Faure wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hello, > > > > Thanks a lot for sane-1.0.10-pre3, and for the plustek driver (I'm using > > plustek-sane-0.45-3). With those my

[sane-devel] Canon Lide30: success!

2003-01-30 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 09:21:21AM +0100, Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > Some of the remaining LM983x projects have stopped their work and > put a link the Plustek page. Some have not (the sourceforge project for > the LiDE30), as this guy plays around with the code on his own for to improve > the i

[sane-devel] Canon Lide30: success!

2003-01-30 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:15:14PM +0100, David Faure wrote: > The most annoying thing for end users is that the /dev devices don't exist > (on a Mandrake 9.0), I had to mknod for /dev/pt_drv and /dev/usbscanner... ThatÄs a job for the distribution. Either the base installation should set up

[sane-devel] Canon Lide30: success!

2003-01-30 Thread David Faure
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 30 January 2003 10:51, scott fagg wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > > On Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2003 12:53, David Faure wrote: > > > * the only bug I'm seeing is that if I scan in a random resolution, s= ay 400 > > > DPI

[sane-devel] Canon Lide30: success!

2003-01-30 Thread David Faure
=2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 29 January 2003 22:49, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Hi, >=20 > not being the plustek maintainer but responding anyway: >=20 > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:53:08PM +0100, David Faure wrote: > > * why isn't plustek-sane part of sane? Would

[sane-devel] Re: Microtek 3700 USB and sane 1.0.8 / libusb 1.5

2003-01-30 Thread Glenn Ramsey
Hi Jonathon, > Message: 12 > From: Jonathan Cowherd > To: "'sane-de...@www.mostang.com'" > Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 11:00:06 -0500 > Subject: [sane-devel] Microtek 3700 USB and sane 1.0.8 / libusb 1.5 > > > I've been trying to get my Microtek 3700 to work with SuSE Linux for > about a year.

[sane-devel] xsane/plustek timeouts (was: xane timeout if do scan after preview)

2003-01-30 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
Hi, sorry, I didn't notice, that it might be Plustek backend related problem= ! Well, I aggree with Henning:=20 Try and update your kernel, there are some reports that there are problem= s with older USB subsystem implementations, that way, that you have to repl= ug the scanner, when the system i

[sane-devel] Canon Lide30: success!

2003-01-30 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
Hi there, On Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2003 22:49, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Hi, > > not being the plustek maintainer but responding anyway: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:53:08PM +0100, David Faure wrote: > > * why isn't plustek-sane part of sane? Wouldn't this make things much > > easier for all

[sane-devel] Canon Lide30: success!

2003-01-30 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
Hi, On Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2003 12:53, David Faure wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > > Thanks a lot for sane-1.0.10-pre3, and for the plustek driver (I'm usin= g > plustek-sane-0.45-3). With those my USB CanoScan Lide 30 works perfectl= y. > > Two questions: >

[sane-devel] stupid question about SCSI

2003-01-30 Thread Mark Plowman
On 29 Jan 2003 11:09:32 +0100, Mark Plowman wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 08:47:17 +, Major A > wrote: [...] > > It IS the ISA card I was talking about, with the DTC436P chip on it. > > It is not supported by Linux, or at least not properly (there is > > only one success story of someone