[sane-devel] Re: [patch] xscanimage: resolution of the resulting GIMP image

2003-01-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
--BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp" Content-Disposition: inline --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 10:59:24PM +0100, Henning Mei

[sane-devel] Re: [patch] xscanimage: resolution of the resulting GIMP image

2003-01-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 09:17:45PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Oups, forgotten the patch... A bit too late for 1.0.10 but after that we can include the patch. > --- xscanimage.c 2003-01-12 20:45:27.0 +0100 > +++ /home/aurel32/xscanimage.c2003-01-12 20:45:09.0

[sane-devel] mustek_pp driver version 12-alpha

2003-01-12 Thread Melanie
Hi, On 2003.01.12 21:00 Jochen Eisinger wrote: > I just commited version 12-alpha of the mustek_pp driver to the SANE > CVS. It's a complete rewrite of the backend based on information > provided by Mustek (thank you!). Is there any hope of support for the ScanExpress A3 EP anytime soon? Or,=20 1

[sane-devel] Epson contacts

2003-01-12 Thread Oliver Schwartz
Hi, my attempts to get the Epson Perfection 660 working with the SnapScan=20 backend haven't been all that successful so far. It seems that the=20 Perfection 660 has some subtle protocol differences in comparison to=20 Agfa scanners. In the past I got the impression that Epson gives reasonable=20

[sane-devel] No devices available

2003-01-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:02:09AM +1100, Barry Kirsten wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:28, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:05:42AM +1100, Barry Kirsten wrote: > > > I can't get xsane to recognise my Canoscan 600 scanner under Debian 3.0. > > > > Try "SANE_DEBUG_CAN

[sane-devel] Feature freeze for SANE 1.0.10

2003-01-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, We are now in feature freeze for SANE 1.0.10. That means, no more features are allowed to be included in CVS. Bug fixes and documentation updates are allowed, however. Further time table: 2003-01-25: Code freeze 2003-02-01: Release After code freeze only fixes of grave bugs that render a bac

[sane-devel] [PATCH] Move xscanimage and xsane menu entries in GIMP

2003-01-12 Thread Julien BLACHE
--=-=-= Hi, A couple of people have asked for the xscanimage menu entries in GIMP to be moved to File/Acquire, along with XSane's ones. Here are two patches : - for xscanimage, move the entries to File/Acquire/xscanimage/* - for XSane, move the entries to File/Acquire/XSane/* So both will hav

[sane-devel] Re: [patch] xscanimage: resolution of the resulting GIMP image

2003-01-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Oups, forgotten the patch... --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="xscanimage.resolution.patch" --- xscanimage.c2003-01-12 2

[sane-devel] [patch] xscanimage: resolution of the resulting GIMP image

2003-01-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Here is a patch for xscanimage (when used through gimp) to automatically se= t=20 the resolution of the resulting GIMP image. Regards, Aurelien --pWyi

[sane-devel] mustek_pp driver version 12-alpha

2003-01-12 Thread Jochen Eisinger
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --enigC5068C84F9E9AC538F851276 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I just commited version 12-alpha of the mustek_pp driver to the SANE CVS. It's a complete rewrite of the backend bas

[sane-devel] Re: Sane on Ultra Sparc

2003-01-12 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 08:19:24PM +0100, abel deuring wrote: [...] > (a simple "copy" of struct sg_io_hdr as defined in sg.h, but with > "padding ints" before each pointer declaration. I even don't know, if > the SParc processor use big or low endian pointer/integers, [...] Sparc is big endian

[sane-devel] Re: Sane on Ultra Sparc

2003-01-12 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:59:49AM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: [...] > Yes, the famous "we have io.h but it's broken" bug. At least 1.0.10 > should work around this one. > > I'll just wait for 1.0.10 with the SCSI work-around included and then > add that one to the list. I think 1.0.9 alr

[sane-devel] sane SCSI lockup with anything other than binary mode

2003-01-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 09:49:14AM -0500, Carter Brey wrote: > Running RH 8 distro with upgraded 2.4.19 kernel on a Dell Inspiron 7500 > (PIII). > > I have an Epson GT-8500 scsi scanner attached to the laptop with an > Adaptec 1460A SlimScsi PC card adpater. I use the aha152x kernel module

[sane-devel] [ANN] Plustek Backend update V0.45-1

2003-01-12 Thread Jaeger, Gerhard
Hi, On Sunday, 12. January 2003 15:43, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: [SNIP] > > Hmpf! Depends on how you classify status? On one hand you're > > right - the scanner is not supported perfectly, on the other hand, > > the backend code is stable so far - so what? > > For the backend status I think "al

[sane-devel] [ANN] Plustek Backend update V0.45-1

2003-01-12 Thread Till Kamppeter
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > > For the per-scanner status I usually use something like that: "alpha": > is detected and does scan something, but colors may be completeyl off. > "beta": works, but maybe not in all modes or up to the highest > resolution. "stable": everything works. > I think, "a

[sane-devel] [ANN] Plustek Backend update V0.45-1

2003-01-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 02:49:54PM +0100, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote: > > > Although the picture quality on the CanoScan 1220 and 1240 > > > is not very good, I think we're on the correct way... > > > > Shouldn't the status then be "beta" instead of "stable"? Just a > > nitpick :-) > > Hmpf! Depen

[sane-devel] [ANN] Plustek Backend update V0.45-1

2003-01-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 07:12:39PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: > I have tested your update with my Epson Perfection 1260 Photo (it > survived the driver version shipped with SANE 1.0.9 without needing to > turn it off) and it works well. Only problem is the model > auto-detection. It is wa

[sane-devel] Thank you for help driver CanoScan N656U

2003-01-12 Thread Maurizio Tiecher
I compiled Sane 1.09 on my Linux Red Hat 8.0 live machine and it worked perfectly with my CanoScan N656U scanner. I didn't expect it to be so easy, especially on a platform that doesn't get a whole lot of attention sometimes. Thank you SANE developers! Maurizio Tiecher

[sane-devel] Re: [ANN] Plustek Backend update V0.45-1

2003-01-12 Thread Jaeger, Gerhard
Hi Gene, On Saturday, 11. January 2003 22:08, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Saturday 11 January 2003 10:05, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote: > Announcing a 45-1 release. > > I unpacked it over the old 45 in sane-backends-1.0.9, did a make > clean && make && make install, which apparently went well. > > Fireing u

[sane-devel] [ANN] Plustek Backend update V0.45-1

2003-01-12 Thread Jaeger, Gerhard
Hi Till, On Saturday, 11. January 2003 19:12, Till Kamppeter wrote: > Thgank you for the update. I am preparing an official update for > Mandrake Linux 9.0 now, to preven the Epson 1260 Photo scanners of > Mandrake 9.0 users from being damaged. > > I have tested your update with my Epson Perfectio

[sane-devel] [ANN] Plustek Backend update V0.45-1

2003-01-12 Thread Jaeger, Gerhard
Hi, On Sunday, 12. January 2003 00:20, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: [SNIP] > Please check plustek.desc, the "unsupported" entries are broken, they > are all listed as Canon scanners. I guess you can just remove them > because they are in unsupported.desc now. Okay fixed! > > By the way, I'll rem

[sane-devel] [ANN] Plustek Backend update V0.45-1

2003-01-12 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 12 January 2003 06:22, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: >Hi, > >On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 09:55:05PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: >> Just one thing about using that preferences menu. The builtin >> no activity timeout shuts it (xsane and company) down in about >> 30 seconds, making it hard to st

[sane-devel] Re: [ANN] Plustek Backend update V0.45-1

2003-01-12 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:13, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote: >Hi Gene, > >On Saturday, 11. January 2003 22:08, Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Saturday 11 January 2003 10:05, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote: >> Announcing a 45-1 release. >> >> I unpacked it over the old 45 in sane-backends-1.0.9, did a make >> clean &&

[sane-devel] mac osx with epson usb backend

2003-01-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 06:46:08AM -0500, Karl Heinz Kremer wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 12:12:56PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > [ ... ] > > > > > usb_bulk_write: endpoint=0x02 size=2 TO=6 > > > write completed > > > CFLoopRun returned > > > [sanei_usb] sanei_usb_write_bulk:

[sane-devel] No devices available

2003-01-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:05:42AM +1100, Barry Kirsten wrote: > I can't get xsane to recognise my Canoscan 600 scanner under Debian 3.0. Try "SANE_DEBUG_CANON=255 scanimage -L" to get more debug information. > The aha152x module loads and is configured correctly, as reported by dmesg: > aha

[sane-devel] [ANN] Plustek Backend update V0.45-1

2003-01-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 09:55:05PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > Just one thing about using that preferences menu. The builtin no > activity timeout shuts it (xsane and company) down in about 30 > seconds, making it hard to study the menu's and adjust anything > before xsane goes away. Can

[sane-devel] mac osx with epson usb backend

2003-01-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 09:24:33AM -0800, Ricky Charlet wrote: > Mac OSX 10.2.3 > libusb-0.1.7 > > BUT! > from your advice in the previous post, I replaced my sane-backends with > the sane-backends-2003-01-11 snapshot. (I did a make uninstall; make > distclean in sane-backends-1.0

[sane-devel] No devices available

2003-01-12 Thread Barry Kirsten
Hello all, I can't get xsane to recognise my Canoscan 600 scanner under Debian 3.0. The aha152x module loads and is configured correctly, as reported by dmesg: aha152x1: trying software interrupt, ok. scsi1 : Adaptec 152x SCSI driver; $Revision: 2.4 $ (scsi1:6:0) 01 03 01 32 08 00 Vendor: CANON

[sane-devel] How many scanners on an ieee1394 bus

2003-01-12 Thread Jonathan Buzzard
and...@users.sourceforge.net said: > As many as these busses take, in principle. There might be a limit on > IEEE1394 simply because you run out of sg devices after a while, but > I'm not sure what the limit is. As a matter of fact, I'm not even sure > how many devices you can have on an IEEE1394

[sane-devel] sane SCSI lockup with anything other than binary mode

2003-01-12 Thread Carter Brey
Hi, Running RH 8 distro with upgraded 2.4.19 kernel on a Dell Inspiron 7500 (PIII). I have an Epson GT-8500 scsi scanner attached to the laptop with an Adaptec 1460A SlimScsi PC card adpater. I use the aha152x kernel module as a driver. This combo used to work perfectly (no problems with dete

[sane-devel] Info: More re-badged Artec E+ 48U scanners

2003-01-12 Thread Michael Herder
Hi, just in case someone wants to know it/for the list archive: It has been reported, that the following scanners are re-badged Artec E+ 48U models, and therefore work with the artec_eplus48 backend: Memorex Mem 48u (reported by Avrum Goodblatt) Medion MD4394 (reported by Keith Abraham) Obviousl

[sane-devel] [ANN] Plustek Backend update V0.45-1

2003-01-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 07:07:49PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > On checking to make sure of my facts, > I found the loffOnEnd was 0, and lampOff also at 0. So I assume my > file was overwritten at some point by a fresher version. At least the original sane-backends "make install" does not

[sane-devel] How many scanners on an ieee1394 bus

2003-01-12 Thread Major A
> Does anyone know how many scanners you can hang on an ieee1394 or USB 2.0 > bus and still get sane to work on all of them? As many as these busses take, in principle. There might be a limit on IEEE1394 simply because you run out of sg devices after a while, but I'm not sure what the limit is. A

[sane-devel] Re: Sane on Ultra Sparc

2003-01-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 07:40:17PM +0100, T. Ribbrock wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 06:15:58PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > > Ok. This is for SANE 1.0.8? gcc version? Compilation worked without any > > patches? bosth shared libs and dynamic loading works? USB and X > > clients are

[sane-devel] [ANN] Plustek Backend update V0.45-1

2003-01-12 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 04:05:59PM +0100, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote: > I've currently updated the Plustek Backend. > New version now is 0.45-1. > All changes are now in CVS and will go into SANE-1.0.10. Please check plustek.desc, the "unsupported" entries are broken, they are all listed as Canon