On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:38:12PM +0100, abel deuring wrote:
> "T. Ribbrock" wrote:
[...]
> Hmmm. Are you sure that cdrecord works as a 32 bit application on a 64
> bit Linux kernel using the SG interface?
Aparently yes... I don't have a burner in an Ultra myself, but on
aurora-devel, there's at
Hi,
> in the end we got it so far:
> The Epson 660 seems to be a rebadged AGFA scnapscan e26
I received an USB log of a windows scan and the protocol looks indeed=20
similar. I'll change the snapscan backend to make it recognize the=20
scanner, maybe we're lucky.
Regards,
Oliver
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 02:35:04PM +0100, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> > If we get reports about real tests with scanners, the entries will be
> > changed to "yes" or "no".
>
> Should we ever get this to work I'll happily submit a report... For
> the time being, the "User-level SCSI support" status f
Hi there,
in the end we got it so far:
The Epson 660 seems to be a rebadged AGFA scnapscan e26
--> see below.
As scanimage currently does not work you might ask
the AGFA specialists on the sane mailing list...
Gerhard
BTW: No need to cc the mail to me!
On Friday, 10. January 2003 00:06, tcp-is
"T. Ribbrock" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:46:55PM +0100, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> [...]
> > Hm. I am by no means an expert in any way, but I'd naively assume that
> > this type of problem must have been encountered (and maybe solved) by
> > other programs as well? I wonder how things like cd
Howdy,
I'm seeking help with getting an epson USB u636 scanner working with =
sane (xsane & scanimage). I've come down quite a long path to arrive at =
"it's just so close but not yet working". I hope to find the needed help =
to get the job done here.
My current problem is that s
Hi all,
I've noticed that my hand-edited /etc/sane.d/epson.conf on a Mandrake
9.0 system may get truncated over a reboot. Similar symptoms (empty
configuration file that is) have been reported in
http://www.mostang.com/pipermail/sane-devel/2002-November/005006.html
if I understand correctly.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:46:55PM +0100, T. Ribbrock wrote:
[...]
> Hm. I am by no means an expert in any way, but I'd naively assume that
> this type of problem must have been encountered (and maybe solved) by
> other programs as well? I wonder how things like cdrecord or suchlike
> work on these
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 02:21:48PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[...]
> "???" really means "untested". E.g. I have access to some "exotic"
> platforms, but only remote and they don't have scanners. So I can only
> test compilation but not USB or SCSI.
Ah, thanks for the clarification!
> I
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:01:58PM +0100, Thomas Soumarmon wrote:
> Else, is there a "how-to" about writing sane backend ?
No howto, but some things to check for or to avoid:
doc/backend-writing.txt.
Bye,
Henning
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:46:55PM +0100, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, neither do I know this. Has that issue been resolved
> > > for Alpha machines?
> >
> > I don't know. But according to Doug , similar problems exist for Itanium
> > processors.
>
> Then I'd be surprised if Alph
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:26:34PM +0100, abel deuring wrote:
> "T. Ribbrock" wrote:
[...]
> > For sane this means that to compile sane 64bit one would have to
> > (re-)build *all* related libraries (starting with libc, libm, etc.pp.)
> > 64bit - quite a lot of work.
>
> So you run *only* 32 bit a
"T. Ribbrock" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:41:45AM +0100, abel deuring wrote:
> [...]
> > The SS20 is as 32 bit machine, so this looks indeed like a 32/64 bit
> > problem.
> >
> > But is there really no way to compile Sane as a 64 bit program on an
> > UltraSparc?
>
> I jst checked back
Hello everybody,
Owning an excellent HP scanjet 5470c scanner, I would like to make it wor=
k=20
with my mandrake 9.0 linux box as I would like to get rid of Win2k.
USB Snoopy helped me to get some logs of :
* turn on/off the scanner
* turn on/off the HP scanning software
* preview scan in full c
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:41:45AM +0100, abel deuring wrote:
[...]
> The SS20 is as 32 bit machine, so this looks indeed like a 32/64 bit
> problem.
>
> But is there really no way to compile Sane as a 64 bit program on an
> UltraSparc?
I jst checked back with some Aurora folks and they confirm
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 08:16:35AM +0100, Ulrich Deiters wrote:
> I just made a few minor changes (fixed an uninitialized variable, inserted
> checks for return status of some subroutines).
Ok. ChangeLog entry is missing :-)
Bye,
Henning
T. Ribbrock wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:23:44AM +0100, abel deuring wrote:
>
>>Dr. Ing. Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
>
>
> [Problem with Mustek Scanner on UltraSparc/Linux]
>
>
>>[sanei_scsi] sanei_scsi.issue: 0x70260008
>>dev_max(currently)=11 max_active_device=6 (origin 1)
>> scsi_dma_free
I just made a few minor changes (fixed an uninitialized variable, inserted
checks for return status of some subroutines).
Sincerely yours,
Ulrich Deiters
--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:23:44AM +0100, abel deuring wrote:
> Dr. Ing. Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
[Problem with Mustek Scanner on UltraSparc/Linux]
> [sanei_scsi] sanei_scsi.issue: 0x70260008
> dev_max(curren
19 matches
Mail list logo
