Hi,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:23:27PM +0100, Franz Bakan wrote:
> >Bye the way: do the binaries have the correct .exe extension?
> >Otherwise I guess some Makefile work will be necessary.
>
> I get binaries with .exe extension because I use the -Zexe flag
> in my local config.site ld-flags.
Lib
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:08:31AM +0100, Enno Fennema wrote:
> I would like to make some comments on the SANE 2.06 draft standard.
Thanks for your comments. I hope I can put some more time into SANE2
during the next days.
> They represent my personal preferences and proposals and are offere
Hi,
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:59:24 +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>Can we remove the configure.os2 script?
Yes, you can remove it.
As told before configure works out of the box now.
I think it's because the recent autoconf-stuff contains
OS/2-compatibility-patches And of course because
of
Marek Blaszkowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
>>What is the debug output, when a scan is started with the environment
>>variable SANE_DEBUG_SANEI_SCSI=255 ?
>
>
> I attached file out256.txt with debug messages.
> The line with the message:
> [sanei_scsi] sanei_scsi_req_wait: SCSI command complained:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:16:12PM +, Alexis wrote:
> > You should see at least the following messages:
> > kernel: usb.c: registered new driver usbscanner
> > kernel: scanner.c: probe_scanner: User specified USB scanner --
> > Vendor:Product - 55f:21d (if you are lucky: kernel: usb.c: usb
Alle 20:03, mercoledì 4 dicembre 2002, Gene Heskett ha scritto:
> And what kernel version was that? I ask because I just had to
> backup from 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc3 in order to print, all 4 ports on
> the 2 hubs available externally are full here due to mouse, ups,
> scanner and printer. My mobo ha
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:04:00PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> Perhaps someone should tell this to the maintainer of the scanner.o
> kernel module, so that he can modify the module as described and and
> also add the vendor/product IDs.
In theory, yes. In reality, I haven't ever seen any
Perhaps someone should tell this to the maintainer of the scanner.o
kernel module, so that he can modify the module as described and and
also add the vendor/product IDs.
In addition this MF device should be added to the list of supported
scanners on the SANE site.
Till
LukenShiro wrote:
>
Thanks very much Henning, you've taken me a lot further along the road to
understanding this thing. Will take it up with Steve again. Bye.
--
Alexis
Registered Linux User 276336. The Penguin Rocks.
I sometimes CQ #171406154
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 9:53 pm, you wrote:
> You should see at least the following messages:
> kernel: usb.c: registered new driver usbscanner
> kernel: scanner.c: probe_scanner: User specified USB scanner --
> Vendor:Product - 55f:21d (if you are lucky: kernel: usb.c: usbscanner
> driver cla
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:03:22AM +0100, Franz Bakan wrote:
> since updating autoconf to 2.5x I now don't need
> the os2unix.cmd helper application no more :-)
Can we remove the configure.os2 script?
> 1. configure now needs much more time
> Not a real problem and probably nothing that ca
Hi,
While updating configure.in, I got some starnge compilation errors in
epso_scsi.c and sm3600.c. They both didn't like the u_something types
(u_char in the epson case). The reason is that these files didn't
include sane/config.h as first include file but somewhere later in the
code. As config.h
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 11:08, Enno Fennema wrote:
> 2) SANE_Handle
> A SANE_Handle points to a very important structure, viz.
I do not see an advantage of this and I do not see a reason to do any cha=
nges=20
here. The way sane1 does handle it does work.
The sane standard is defined as a f
Alle 16:27, mercoledì 4 dicembre 2002, Till Kamppeter ha scritto:
> And with which SANE version/driver/configuration did you make the
> device finally scanning?
The scanner.c module has to be edited because the kernel usb scanner
developers probably had been too restrictive (only one usb interfac
LukenShiro wrote:
>
>>But the scanner I can figure out. I\'ve tried the perfection 610 drivers
>>but they don\'t work. The scanner part scans 1200*600dpi.
>>I suspect the usb bus doesn\'t recognize the scanner part.
>
>
> Yes, you are right! You have to edit the scanner.c file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The man page sane-mustek_pp contains examples for your scanner. Don't
forget to uncomment the mustek_pp line in your dll.conf too.
regards
- -- jochen
Hans Krueger wrote:
> what should that mustek_pp.conf file should look like for Mustek 600 III
> E
Hello,
is the LightLid35 Option with a Microtek Scanmaker X6 usable with sane /
xsane?
Christoph
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 14:24, LukenShiro wrote:
>Alle 20:03, mercoledì 4 dicembre 2002, Gene Heskett ha scritto:
>> And what kernel version was that? I ask because I just had to
>> backup from 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc3 in order to print, all 4 ports
>> on the 2 hubs available externally are full
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 11:16, LukenShiro wrote:
>Alle 16:27, mercoledì 4 dicembre 2002, Till Kamppeter ha scritto:
>> And with which SANE version/driver/configuration did you make
>> the device finally scanning?
>
>The scanner.c module has to be edited because the kernel usb
> scanner develo
I would like to make some comments on the SANE 2.06 draft standard.
They represent my personal preferences and proposals and are offerered
for discussion but rather than prefixing each statement with 'I
think...' 'I propose...' etc.
They are presented as statements of fact, which they are not.
So
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:47:00AM +0800, Fan Dan wrote:
> Now I have finded why . After I start scan(0x43), I not wait for scanner
> ready(0x35), that cause my scanner only moving motor to start of scan and
> not scan.
So scanning works if you don't use 0x35? Can you send me a patch so I
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:43:46PM -0500, Bruce Riddle wrote:
> I'm running Solaris 9 X86,
> succesfully built sane-backends-1.0.9, sane-frontends-1.0.9 xsane-0.89
Good, one more platform for our list. Which compiler + version did you
use? Does dynamic loading and shared libraries work?
Hai henning:
Thanks a lot
Now I have finded why . After I start scan(0x43), I not wait for scanner
ready(0x35), that cause my scanner only moving motor to start of scan and
not scan.
_
ÓëÁª»úµÄÅóÓѽøÐн»Á÷£¬ÇëʹÓà MSN
Hi.
On: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 22:35:19 +0100 (CET),
"Franz Bakan" wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 21:55:04 +0100 (CET), Rene Rebe wrote:
> =
> >Hi.
> >
> >Is there still the u_int64_t problem in CVS for OS/2 - or is it
> >already worked-around in some way?
> =
> No, you have worked around it. There
--0-1864031906-1039000502=:50580
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
hello
this is my mustek_pp.conf
works on RH 8.0
Hopefully it will help
Richard
what should that mustek_pp.conf file should look like
for Mustek 600 III
EP Plus
scanner that I have.
only
what should that mustek_pp.conf file should look like for Mustek 600 III
EP Plus
scanner that I have.
only one parallel port
suse 8.1
thanks
--
Hans Krueger
hans...@prexar.com
registered Linux user 289023
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve n
26 matches
Mail list logo
