On Sat, 24 Nov 2001 23:29:34 +0100, abel deuring wrote:
>> 1. sharp.c refuses to compile because of the last changes in CVS:
>>
>> sharp.c: In function `do_cancel':
>> sharp.c:2262: storage size of `ds' isn't known
>> sharp.c:2264: warning: implicit declaration of function `shmctl'
>>
>> I thin
is buying parallel port to usb converter for ibm ideascan worth while?
computer is dell i5000e, w/ a usb ports, 25-pin parallel port,
and serial port.
from this 1999 thread, his scanner may be a scanmaker 330cs...
http://www.mostang.com/mail-archive/sane-devel/1999-12/0210.html
...has anybody t
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 11:56:53AM +0100, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote:
> am I right, that the Mustek devices use CID instead of CCD sensors?
> So this is good news, that they seem to work somehow, as the Plustek
> devices are using CCD sensors...
I'm not sure, what CID is :-] As far as I know, the
Hi Juergen,
I also did the tests on a Windows 98 Notebook with HP PrecisionScan Pro
V 2.02. At 200 dpi/24 Bits Truecolor it stops about 5 times for an A4
scan. 300 dpi is nearly impossible. What resolution are you using that
you don't have the problems ?
--Peter
Juergen Sauer wrote:
> USB is qu
Am Sonntag, 25. November 2001 14:05 schrieb abel deuring:
> Juergen Sauer wrote:
> Since none of the USB experts seems to be available at present, here my
> $0.02. (disclaimer: I haven't ever even connected any USB device to a
> Linux box...)
I was forced to, because I ran out of PCI-Slots, so an
Hello Juergen,
I don't have a solution. But I can tell what's going on. The scan speed
of the scanner can not be reduced any more. The speed mode "slow" gives
the same speed as "auto" and "normal". Above about 200 dpi the scanner
generates more data than USB can transfer to the computer. Thus the
Juergen Sauer wrote:
>
> Am Freitag, 23. November 2001 00:19 schrieben Sie:
> > option enable-image-buffering
>
> Somewhat thing was what I'm looking for.
>
> It is not nessessary to have the same Device-Bandwith to the ram as with
> SCSI. Scanning time is not important. My topic is more to save
Am Freitag, 23. November 2001 00:19 schrieben Sie:
> option enable-image-buffering
Somewhat thing was what I'm looking for.
It is not nessessary to have the same Device-Bandwith to the ram as with
SCSI. Scanning time is not important. My topic is more to save the
scanner's mechanical lifietime.
--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Peter Kirchgessner wrote:
[ ... ]
> I would like to know what other scanners (Epson, Miicrotek,...) are
> doing when scan
