Hi all,
I (and possibly others) have problems using
scsi * * Scanner
in the conf file. In this case no scanners are found. If I compile my
backend with SANE-1.0.4 all works fine. Is there a bug in sanei-scsi?
Regards
Karsten
This is a debug output of SANE-1.0.4:
[microtek2] parse_config_f
Sorry, the Sparc IPX to which the scanner was attached was running Solaris 7,
not Solaris 8 as I mentioned, not that this is likely to make any difference.
Bill Sebok Computer Software Manager, Univ. of Maryland, Astronomy
Internet: w...@astro.umd.eduURL: http://www.astro.umd.edu/
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned before or even if I may have reported
it before: has the network protocol been thought out so that network scanning
will work if the backend and frontend machines have different byte order?
It does not appear to be so.
The backend is on a Sparc IPX (i.e. an
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:07:04 -0400 (EDT), w...@astro.umd.edu said:
Bill> I'm not sure if this has been mentioned before or even if I
Bill> may have reported it before: has the network protocol been
Bill> thought out so that network scanning will work if the backend
Bill> and frontend
You could have a look at josi scan lite, as itt displays a preview of
your scan. It requires Java to run and is still in it's infancy but
check it out if you're interested.
More info at http://www.objects.com.au/products/josi.
mick
Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> What I'm wondering about is why xs
Hi,
> Is this one updated in CVS code ?
> I only use CVS code of sane.
No, it's not yet updated in sane CVS. The snapscan project uses it's own CVS
at sourceforge for development.
However, the snapscan code should work flawlessly with the CVS version of
sane.
Regards,
Oliver
ncluded is support for the SnapScan 1236U, thanks
> to Klaas Freitag and
> Sebastien Sable.
>
> I've released a new version of the backend which may
> be downloaded from here:
>
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/snapscan/snapscan-20010920.tar.gz
>
>
> I'm interes
