Chris Rowson wrote:
> On 19 May 2013 23:13, "Steve Holdoway" wrote:
>
>> Can anyone help with this? I set it all up a few months ago, the samba
>> side being standard upgrades via debian - configured as a PDC, and the
>> windows 7 clients being clean installs, with the standard
>> lanmanwor
On 19 May 2013 23:13, "Steve Holdoway" wrote:
>
> Can anyone help with this? I set it all up a few months ago, the samba
> side being standard upgrades via debian - configured as a PDC, and the
> windows 7 clients being clean installs, with the standard
> lanmanworkstation regedits done.
>
> They'
Can anyone help with this? I set it all up a few months ago, the samba
side being standard upgrades via debian - configured as a PDC, and the
windows 7 clients being clean installs, with the standard
lanmanworkstation regedits done.
They've been working fine since then, but have now started failin
Hi,
I've got a modded NAS with a patched kernel 3.8.3
whenever I try to upload a file larger than a few bytes from windows,
the nas crashes completely. Creating folders, downloading and browsing
works fine.
I could not find any entry in the logs.
Everything else works fine, the kernel usually is
Just in case, how can check that if used the Samba_Internal?
2013/5/19 Matthieu Patou
> On 05/18/2013 05:26 AM, Sandbox wrote:
>
>>
>> 2013-05-17 00:43 keltezéssel, Marc Muehlfeld írta:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Am 16.05.2013 22:41, schrieb Sandbox:
>>>
Is it possible (well, look like it works)
On 05/18/2013 05:26 AM, Sandbox wrote:
2013-05-17 00:43 keltezéssel, Marc Muehlfeld írta:
Hello,
Am 16.05.2013 22:41, schrieb Sandbox:
Is it possible (well, look like it works) to include a preconfigured
bind zone to samba named.conf, so I don't get that annoying zone
conflict error message w
On 05/16/2013 02:10 PM, Tony Nelson wrote:
I compiled samba-4.0.5 from source on Ubuntu 12.04 and was following the
instructions here:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC
The exact command I executed was:
root@va-dc:/usr/local/samba# bin/samba-tool domain join
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 20:10 +0800, wong lmark wrote:
> No. I am not sure that where is the dns reconds store in Samba4.
> But I have not install bind before upgrade.
You can see them:
samba-tool dns query [options]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instr
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 15:29 +0200, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
> Am 13.05.2013 14:53, schrieb daniel gonzalez:
> >> For doing it with ADUC, see here:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO/AD_Delegation#Delegating_.27Joining_Computers_to_the_domain.27-permissions
> >
> > Hello Marc
Yes, but I never see a dns folder in my samba/private/
I still finding out the problems,
2013/5/19 steve
> On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 18:18 +0800, wong lmark wrote:
> > Haha, I am not sure that.
> > May I ask a question? Is it the DNS need to take some configuration
> > after classupgrade?
>
> No, bu
Hello folks,
Samba 3.5.6 running and I have following share:
[public]
path = /data/public
read only = No
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
directory security mask = 0750
vfs object = acl_xattr
nt acl support = yes
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 18:18 +0800, wong lmark wrote:
> Haha, I am not sure that.
> May I ask a question? Is it the DNS need to take some configuration
> after classupgrade?
No, but make sure that none of the old dns, ldap, smb nor nmb are
running before you call samba.
Did you get a chance to che
Haha, I am not sure that.
May I ask a question? Is it the DNS need to take some configuration after
classupgrade?
2013/5/19 steve
> On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 18:02 +0800, wong lmark wrote:
> > I read a article "
> http://www.smilingsouls.net/blog/linux/ad_integration.html
> > "
> > Just for referenc
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 18:02 +0800, wong lmark wrote:
> I read a article "http://www.smilingsouls.net/blog/linux/ad_integration.html
> "
> Just for reference.
Hi
That's for joining a Linux client to an already configured DC. BTW it's
strange. He configures nss-ldap and then uses winbind!
Steve
--
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 11:57 +0200, Ulrich Schneider wrote:
> I don't have a clue ... just want to make samba and windows ad work
>
> uli@uli-sd30v10:/data$ net ads join -U Administrator
> Host is not configured as a member server.
> Invalid configuration. Exiting
> Failed to join domain: This
I read a article "http://www.smilingsouls.net/blog/linux/ad_integration.html
"
Just for reference.
2013/5/19 Ulrich Schneider
> I don't have a clue ... just want to make samba and windows ad work
>
> uli@uli-sd30v10:/data$ net ads join -U Administrator
> Host is not configured as a member serve
I don't have a clue ... just want to make samba and windows ad work
uli@uli-sd30v10:/data$ net ads join -U Administrator
Host is not configured as a member server.
Invalid configuration. Exiting
Failed to join domain: This operation is only allowed for the PDC of the
domain.
uli@uli-sd30v1
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 11:30 +0200, Ulrich Schneider wrote:
> Looks to me like "valid users" is not working.
>valid users = @samdom+schueler
>
> [lehrer]
>path = /data/lehrer
>comment = Lehrer
>read only = no
>valid users = @samdom+lehrer
Hi
samdom is a dom
Looks to me like "valid users" is not working.
I get a popup windows with username/pwd when accessing the shares.
Or is there an error in smb.conf?
Is this correct? ...
valid users = @samdom+schueler
... meaning
windows group schueler
windows domain samdom
---
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 16:27 +0800, wong lmark wrote:
> Please let me simplify the question. I chose the in place upgrade
> Samba 3 to Samba 4 in my CentOS 6.4.
Hi
Ok, so this Domain has been produced by:
/usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain
classicupgrade /etc/samba/smb.conf --dbdir=/var/lib/sam
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 09:14 +0200, Ulrich Schneider wrote:
> Hm, your alternative (understanding windows acls) seems not much better
> to me.
>
> Yesterday it seemed to work ... until I deleted a folder created by an
> administrator as a ordinary user.
>
> Do I get this right? valid users = @gr
Hm, your alternative (understanding windows acls) seems not much better
to me.
Yesterday it seemed to work ... until I deleted a folder created by an
administrator as a ordinary user.
Do I get this right? valid users = @group ... so @group could be any
group in the Active Directory?
Hi
I
22 matches
Mail list logo
