On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 10:59 +0100, Adam Thorn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing regular tdb corruption; typical log messages are:
>
> tdb(/var/db/samba/sessionid.tdb): tdb_rec_read bad magic 0x42424242 at
> offset=672032
>
> tdb(/var/db/samba/connections.tdb): tdb_rec_read bad magic 0x0 at
> offset=11
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Björn JACKE wrote:
> On 2013-05-14 at 13:51 -0300 Fernando Lozano sent off:
>> Another question: if my CentOS server is using samba3 from sernet
>> repos, may I upgrade them using sernet samba4? Or should I uninstall
>> samba3 and do a clean install of samba4, red
I think this depends on whether "Register this connection's address in DNS"
is checked.
See the screenshot at:
http://serverfault.com/questions/303026/what-do-all-the-settings-in-the-advanced-tcp-ip-properties-dns-tab-mean
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Chris Rowson
wrote:
> Having reconfigur
Having reconfigured Samba4 to use BIND as a DNS server to get dynamic DNS
updates working, I'm still working to understand the system.
The Windows client I'm testing only seems up update DNS if I run ipconfig
/registerdns. It doesn't update DNS at startup or IP change OOTB. Is it
expected that Win
There seems to be a problem with the "sernet-samba-ad" init script, at
least on CentOS.
Samba fails to start. The log file shows the following:
[2013/05/15 20:48:37, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:369(binary_smbd_main)
samba version 4.0.5-SerNet-RedHat-1.el6 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell
Thanks,
I will try it.
- Original Message -
From: Maximilian Mehnert
To: Adrian Berlin
Subject: Re: [Samba] ZFS on Linux + ACLs
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 06:25:00 +0200
Adrian Berlin writes:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone test ZFS on Linux and ACLs?
> I can't setup POSIX ACLs
Hi Denis,
my smb.conf on PDC (hostname=donald) looks like that:
[global]
workgroup = MYDOM
server string = Fileserver
interfaces = 172.16.0.1/16, 127.0.0.1
update encrypted = Yes
map to guest = Bad User
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://172.16.0.1
On 2013-05-14 at 13:51 -0300 Fernando Lozano sent off:
> >this is just a heads-up that SerNet does provide Samba 4 packages
> >(including AD DC package) now.
> It was told on the fedora user's list that the kerberos
> implementation used by Fedora, RHEL and CentOS conflicts with the
> samba one, an
Hi Lucas,
on both samba hosts (donald and pluto) these commands work great:
id johndoe
getent group
getent passwd
My pluto:/etc/nsswitch.conf looks like that:
[...]
passwd: compat ldap
group: compat ldap
shadow: compat ldap
[...]
I want to add, that the described prob
Hi Denis,
on both samba hosts (donald and pluto) these commands work great:
id johndoe
getent group
getent passwd
My pluto:/etc/nsswitch.conf looks like that:
[...]
passwd: compat ldap
group: compat ldap
shadow: compat ldap
[...]
I want to add, that the described proble
2013.05.14 18:48, Denis Cardon rašė:
> Hi Giedrius,
>
>> i've got initial setup on DC1 (4.0.1)... all working good and
>> flawless
>> Added additional geographically distributed controllers (DC2, DC3,
>> DC4,DC5) with 4.0.5 - no problem.
>> All PC's can connect to their own site/DC
11 matches
Mail list logo