On Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 1:53:49 PM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote:
>
> I think that people are more often using polymake and/or LattE from within
> Sage nowadays ... I found out about SymPol (
> https://www.geometrie.uni-rostock.de/software/) today, has anyone worked
> on a potential interface for t
Some limited testing of a binary distribution on different OS X versions
can be done via Travis
CI. https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage_binary_tester/blob/master/.travis.yml
(needs updating)
On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 9:56:02 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Our binary most likely works on OSX 10.
On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 5:44:34 PM UTC-7, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>
> One way to define (something almost the same as) what you want is :
> sage: f=piecewise([((-oo,0),x^3),((0,oo),x^2)],var=x)
> sage: f
> piecewise(x|-->x^3 on (-oo, 0), x|-->x^2 on (0, +oo); x)
> [...] Except for the po
Try if it works if you use rationals (-48/100) instead of floats (-0.48).
On Monday, February 3, 2020 at 8:48:34 AM UTC-5, Murad Tukan wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Computer info:
> CPU: i7-6500U @ 2.50GHZ
> Memory: 16.0GB
>
> Sage information: SageMath 9.0 (Windows, installed using the .exe file),
>
Read https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/ if you wish to make
changes to Sage, and https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29379 for the change
ticket that makes the upgrade to R 3.6.3
On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 3:02:01 PM UTC-7, hbetx9 wrote:
>
> I _almost_ got this to work, I have R 3.6.3
On Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 8:01:38 PM UTC-7, hbetx9 wrote:
>
> No, I just want all users to have this at default. Where should I put the
> SAGE_ROOT directory? /usr/local?
>
Use "./configure --prefix=/usr/local/opt/sage-9.0" to set the installation
prefix (SAGE_LOCAL).
--
You received th
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 at 6:35:53 AM UTC-7, David Einstein wrote:
>
> I did a brew install pkg-config and was notified that version 0.29.1 was
> already installed, but I could upgrade to 0.29.2, so I did so. Then did a
> `make distclean` and then make and got marginally further. Now it dies
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/discrete_geometry/sage/geometry/polyhedron/base.html#sage.geometry.polyhedron.base.Polyhedron_base.integral_points
On Friday, April 17, 2020 at 11:16:30 AM UTC-7, Bert Henry wrote:
>
> I tried it with
> var('x, y')
> assume(x,"integer")
> assume(x>0)
> ass
OK, I know how *I* use SageMath.
But how do *you* use it? Let us know in the online SageMath User Forum.
This is one of the activities of next week's *Global Virtual SageDays 109*,
a 50-hour virtual event held May 27–29, 2020.
Preliminary information and registration at
https://wiki.sagemath.o
On Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 12:18:08 PM UTC-7, Ingo Dahn wrote:
>
> Sounds like an interesting event, what is the intended audience?
> Developers? Researchers? Educators?
>
All of the above. We have added some more information at
https://wiki.sagemath.org/days109
> Specific times/tracks for
Scheduled presentations:
- Fredrik Strömberg - An introduction to SageMath and Python
- Jean-Philippe Labbé - Combinatorics and geometry of polyhedra in Sage
- Krystal Guo - Using SageMath in Algebraic Graph Theory
- Alex J. Best - Computations with p-adic polylogarithms in Sage
- E
On Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 11:25:56 PM UTC-7, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> On Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 12:18:08 PM UTC-7, Ingo Dahn wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like an interesting event, what is the intended audience?
>> Developers? Researchers? Educators?
>>
>
>
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 2:09:20 PM UTC-7, David Joyner wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:58 PM Matthias Koeppe > wrote:
>
>>
>> There is now a schedule at
>> https://researchseminars.org/seminar/SageDays109
>>
>
> Are the times liste
On Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 9:23:38 AM UTC-7, pedrito...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Matthias,
> In teaching,
>
> https://cursos-0-fc-ugr.github.io/Matematicas/derivadas-app-estudio-func-thebelab.html
>
> https://github.com/pedritomelenas/Algebra-conmutativa-y-computacional
>
>
> https://github.com/pedri
On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 7:21:35 AM UTC-7, ilyub wrote:
>
> The cygwin people seemed to have removed the physical file (xlocale.h)
> from the cygwin distribution starting with version 3.1.1-1
> https://cygwin.com/packages/summary/cygwin-devel.html.
> Because the include file is missing, sag
On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 2:13:30 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 7:10 PM Matthias Koeppe
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 7:21:35 AM UTC-7, ilyub wrote:
> >>
> >> The cygwin people seemed to have rem
This is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30103
On Friday, July 10, 2020 at 7:42:45 AM UTC-7, Maxime Boissonneault wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am compiling Sage from source on Linux, on a supercomputer. Libraries
> and headers are in non-standard locations. When the make tries to build
> pillow, it fa
You could deactivate conda and try again.
On Tuesday, July 28, 2020 at 8:33:38 PM UTC-7, Luis Enriquez-Contreras
wrote:
>
> OS: Linux Mint 20
>
> SageMath: sage-9.1-Ubuntu_18.04-x86_64.tar.bz2
>
> Hello all, I am trying to install sage 9.1, but I get this error after the
> ./configure
> configu
Problems with the Ubuntu packaging should be reported as an Ubuntu bug.
On Sunday, August 2, 2020 at 11:31:57 PM UTC-7, Samuel Tang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your quick response. I am running on Ubuntu 20.04, and
> installed Sagemath via `sudo apt-get install sagemath`.
> From what I recorded
The issue with "posixmodule" is apparently
https://bugs.python.org/issue41100
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 8:59:14 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> If I do install Python 3.7, then gf2x and ecm both fail to build. The gf2x
> log file says "configure: error: Cannot find a build system c
This fix was already merged in 3.8.4, so
after https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27754 we should be fine.
The PR for Python 3.7 is https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21155, but
our Python 3.7.x is very old already.
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 9:43:15 PM UTC-7, Matthias Koeppe wrote
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 8:59:14 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> If I do install Python 3.7, then gf2x and ecm both fail to build. The gf2x
> log file says "configure: error: Cannot find a build system compiler
> ". The ecm log file says "checking if globals are prefixed by
> undersc
2020 at 9:52:37 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 8:59:14 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>> If I do install Python 3.7, then gf2x and ecm both fail to build. The
>>> gf2x log file says "configure: error: Cannot find a
de 12, macOS 11 Big Sur"
On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 at 8:19:37 AM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> With a system Python and "make -k", the following packages fail:
>
> gf2x
> ecm
> symmetrica
> rubiks
> ecl
> scipy
>
> On Tuesday, Septemb
On Monday, October 19, 2020 at 10:36:05 AM UTC-7, Carl Eberhart wrote:
>
> I can't load a sage file in either the notebook or terminal version of Sage
> File "", line 121
> if s<>_sage_const_0 :
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>
The syntax <> for "not equal" is no longer valid in
On Tuesday, October 20, 2020 at 11:57:21 AM UTC-7, Carl Eberhart wrote:
>
> Thanks. After looking for the definition of of preparse_file it appears
> that it is imported from a binary file. Will I have to download the source
> and recompile to fix this?
>
Your code in orthogtraps19.sage like
Those who want to help with this problem may
find https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30619 useful -- builds on this system
can be reproduced using "tox -e docker-opensuse-tumbleweed-standard"
On Saturday, November 28, 2020 at 10:23:52 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> please post the top-level co
The actual error is likely further up. This problem could just be the
missing dependency of sagelib on giac, already fixed
in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30858
Try compiling the latest development version,
or do "make giac && make" to work around the problem
On Saturday, November 28, 2020 a
On Monday, November 30, 2020 at 7:47:27 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> we should get opensuse tumbleweed properly supported, with CI.
>
> this entails listing the needed packages in build/pkgs/*/distros/
> like we do for Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.
>
>>
>>
Packages for opensuse are already up in
https
On Wednesday, December 23, 2020 at 5:55:38 AM UTC-8 u...@ll.mit.edu wrote:
>
>>> the MacPorts-specific part would be to create a list of packages to
>> install, and put it into build/pkgs/*/distros/macports
>> and a similar global location.
>>
>
> I'm not sure I understand what that means.
>
Yo
This failure on Cygwin has been fixed
in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31146
On Thursday, January 21, 2021 at 10:29:41 AM UTC-8 user...@gmail.com wrote:
> While building Sage 9.2 from source, the `make` process throws an error
> while building the "fpylll.config" extension. I believe the mos
As Dima said, please report bugs of distribution packaging of Sage to the
distribution.
On Monday, February 1, 2021 at 8:29:17 AM UTC-8 tiger...@gmail.com wrote:
> I should also add this.
> If from an ipython module I invoke `from sage.misc.misc_c import prod`,
> everything works fine.
> On the
Looks like we cannot bootstrap using Python 2.6 any more.
The error seen in the log
is:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19668395/str-format-for-python-2-6-gives-error-where-2-7-does-not
On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 9:53:28 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 5:08 PM
OK, time to officially remove support for building with python 2.6 as
sage-bootstrap-python - https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20023 (needs
review).
On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 10:25:35 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 6:18 PM Matthias Koeppe
> wrote:
> &g
On Friday, March 5, 2021 at 4:08:34 PM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Matthias,
> is it another instance of not having .pc files ready for blas/lapack etc?
>
I don't think so. From Klaus' configure.log above,
===
Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG openblas...
checking BLAS library..
/Sage/sage-9.2/build/make'
> >> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/net/dlp762/share/application-software/Sage/sage-9.2/build/make'
> >> Nothing to (re)build / all up-to-date.
> >> [lsf@dlp762 sage-9.2]$
> >>
> >> I include the config log.
&g
On Tuesday, May 4, 2021 at 7:00:55 AM UTC-7 Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> Trying to list the installed optional packages, I innocently typed :
>
> charpent@zen-book-flip:~$ sage -optional | grep -v not_instal
>
> The answer left me stimyed :
>
> /usr/local/sage-9/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/
We'd need to see the top-level config.log corresponding to a failing build.
On Wednesday, May 19, 2021 at 3:37:42 PM UTC-7 Greg Marks wrote:
> > On a Debian 10 system, building sage-9.3 from source fails with this
> > error:
> >
> > ...
> > [dochtml] Traceback (most recent call last):
> > [doch
Normaliz already supports half-open polyhedra, see section 3.12 ("open
facets") in the Normaliz manual
see https://github.com/Normaliz/Normaliz/blob/master/doc/Normaliz.pdf
On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 1:26:01 PM UTC-7 kcrisman wrote:
> Thanks to the MUCH easier install now of things like pyn
On Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 2:36:27 PM UTC-7 kcrisman wrote:
> Normaliz already supports half-open polyhedra, see section 3.12 ("open
>> facets") in the Normaliz manual
>> see https://github.com/Normaliz/Normaliz/blob/master/doc/Normaliz.pdf
>>
>
> Thank you! But, based on the tickets I've jus
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 at 7:41:16 PM UTC-7 bluf...@gmail.com wrote:
> Using dnf to install sagemath works on Fedora 34, but then /usr/bin/sage
> gives
> a weird error message.
>
Please report Fedora packaging bugs to Fedora.
> Compiling sage from sage-9.2.tar.gz does not work.
> Using
The update to this (and other IPython/Jupyter tickets) is
in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31280 -- which needs help.
On Tuesday, July 27, 2021 at 8:13:29 AM UTC-7 David Lowry-Duda wrote:
> This comes from python-prompt-toolkit. See here:
> https://github.com/prompt-toolkit/python-prompt-too
I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32424 for this issue with Sage
9.4.
On Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 8:15:02 PM UTC-7 wst...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I release cocalc-docker ([1], [2]) a few days ago with sage-9.4, and had
> people reporting back "illegal instruction" issues. S
On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 12:55:46 PM UTC-7 hbetx9 wrote:
> On my system, python2 and python3 is installed, but there is no generic
> python symlink. Does this need to be created for sage and if so should it
> be python3? In installed from tarball, so this is not an issue with the
> Ubuntu
a system
> wide install?
>
> On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 4:22:10 PM UTC-5 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 12:55:46 PM UTC-7 hbetx9 wrote:
>>
>>> On my system, python2 and python3 is installed, but there is no generic
>>> pyt
Thanks, I've noted this
in
https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.4#Availability_as_binaries_and_in_distributions
On Friday, September 3, 2021 at 3:02:47 AM UTC-7 Rolandb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Running the file 'relocate-once.py', I got an error: directory 'python'
> not recognized.
> Changin
Installed the binary distribution? Known to fail with some processors
(https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32424).
Try installing from source instead.
On Sunday, September 5, 2021 at 8:22:16 AM UTC-7 Topaze wrote:
> Hello.
>
> A quick recapitulation of my historic :
>
> Debian 10 + Sagemath 9.2 : O
Instead of:
gamma=vector([t,t^2,t^3])
use:
gamma=vector([t,t^2,t^3]).function(t)
Alternatively, keep gamma as is and use gamma(t=x) instead of gamma(x).
On Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 1:18:52 PM UTC-7 Federico Galetto wrote:
> Hello, I get a warning due to function-call syntax deprecation and
This is a known issue with the binary distributions for Sage 9.3 and 9.4.
See
https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.4#Availability_as_binaries_and_in_distributions
Install from source instead.
On Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 8:01:00 AM UTC-7 GÖKHAN SOYDAN wrote:
> hello everybody,
> I
Report Ubuntu packaging bugs to Ubuntu.
On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 10:50:56 AM UTC-7 mob...@gmail.com wrote:
> I installed *"Sage"* on *Google Colab*
> https://askubuntu.com/a/1159008/1033768
>
> *via the command: *
>
> !sudo apt-get install build-essential m4 dpkg-dev
> !sudo apt-get
No, the 9.4 binaries have the same problem, as noted
in
https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.4#Availability_as_binaries_and_in_distributions
We have two tickets in the 9.5 development series that aim to fix this
problem:
- https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32424 (waiting for review)
- h
"make sagelib-clean" will fix this
On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 12:18:02 PM UTC-8 Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
> A recent upgrade of Debian testing seems to have broken Sage, which does
> not find libgsl.so.25 Crash report attached.
>
> An attempt at make -b also fails (see attached install.
Marc, are you referring to these instructions?
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/launching.html#setting-up-sagemath-as-a-jupyter-kernel-in-an-existing-jupyter-notebook-or-jupyterlab-installation
On Tuesday, February 1, 2022 at 3:28:48 PM UTC-8 Marc Culler wrote:
> So is Sage followin
On Tuesday, February 1, 2022 at 3:28:48 PM UTC-8 Marc Culler wrote:
> Of course Sage's venv is not a true virtualenv as created by venv,
>
It is actually a true venv, unless no system python can be used and Sage
builds its own copy of python3.
--
You received this message because you are s
1:23 PM UTC-6 Marc Culler wrote:
>>>
>>>> No. I was referring to
>>>> https://ipywidgets.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_install.html which
>>>> was Samuel's [more details here] link.
>>>>
>>>> Incidentally, following those instr
finds
> the javascript file in some other path such as usr/local/jupyter and uses
> that file instead. Of course a self-contained app cannot rely on anything
> like that.
>
> - Marc
>
> On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 at 6:59:24 PM UTC-6 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>>
If you consider numpy an obscure library, it may be that your syllabus
needs updating
On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 10:52:19 AM UTC-8 mat...@gmail.com wrote:
> Mean, median and mode are now deprecated. E.g.:
>
> >median([1,2,3])
> 2 :1: DeprecationWarning: sage.stats.basic_stats.median is dep
On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 8:32:39 PM UTC-8 wst...@gmail.com wrote:
> Also, if you want to argue that users should explicitly import
> everything...
No, that's not what I'm arguing.
The deprecation of the basic_stats module happened because Sage has nothing
to offer in this area;
it's a
On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 10:52:19 AM UTC-8 mat...@gmail.com wrote:
> Will Calculus be deprecated too?
>
See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32260 for the next deprecation
proposal.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To un
+1 on adding info on how to install Linux distributions with up-to-date
binary packages of Sage to our installation guide.
See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31485
(The updated installation guide, preview at
https://6212659123a9467b3cb0cd07--sagemath-tobias.netlify.app/installation/index.html
lly?
> For example in sage.all we could do: "from numpy import mean, median". It
> seems strange to not have a top-level "mean" or "median" function, given
> all of the other esoteric top-level functions.
>
>
> On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 10:2
The particular error that you are running into comes from Singular not
being in PATH.
Use "sage -sh" to enter a shell in which SAGE_LOCAL/bin has been added to
PATH.
Then you can activate the venv as you did before.
On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 10:45:00 AM UTC-8 m.derick...@gmail.com wrote:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33440 fixes the problem and is waiting for
review.
On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 11:07:50 AM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> The particular error that you are running into comes from Singular not
> being in PATH.
>
> Use "sage -sh" to
It would be worth checking whether "./sage -pip install -U pythran" or
"./sage -pip install -U git+https://github.com/serge-sans-paille/pythran";
fixes this issue
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 2:01:49 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote:
> Since upgrading to OS X 12.3 a few days ago, along with the
thing suspicious, for what that's worth.
>
> On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 2:34:56 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
>> It would be worth checking whether "./sage -pip install -U pythran" or
>> "./sage -pip install -U git+https://github.com/serge-sans-paille/
On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 12:39:23 AM UTC-7 Jean-Florent Raymond wrote:
> In order to test something I would like to remove from my sage install a
> python package that I installed (and updated) some time ago.
>
> First question:
> How can I remove a package installed with "sage -i"? I found
Which version of Sage is this?
We fixed a bug like this recently that showed up when the environment
variable MAKE was set in a particular way.
See also https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33587
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 3:17:08 AM UTC-7 list...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Thanks, Maxime.
>
> Here is w
>
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 04:32, Matthias Koeppe
> wrote:
>
>> Which version of Sage is this?
>> We fixed a bug like this recently that showed up when the environment
>> variable MAKE was set in a particular way.
>> See also https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33
Report Fedora packaging bugs to Fedora
On Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 3:23:15 AM UTC-7 jacovant...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am running Fedora 36 (had the same issue in Fedora 35) on a Lenovo
> IdeaPad. After installing sage using dnf I tried running it but it failed
> due to: "ImportError: cannot lo
Report Fedora packaging bugs to Fedora.
On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 1:14:00 PM UTC-7 marks...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I recently installed SageMath on my Fedora machine using dnf install
> sagemath.
> The install went fine and I can use the sage interactive shell just fine.
> To
An online event on open-source mathematical software
with the SageMath user and developer community
https://wiki.sagemath.org/days112.358
50 hours around the world
Register today
It's free
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsub
>From config.log:
configure:7443: checking for pkg-config
configure:7466: found /mnt/c/Strawberry/perl/bin/pkg-config
configure:7478: result: /mnt/c/Strawberry/perl/bin/pkg-config
It's picking up pkg-config from your Windows install. Remote
/mnt/c/Strawberry/perl/bin/ from your PATH, and/or i
I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34098 for this
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 2:58:26 PM UTC-7 list...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> When building SageMath on macOS from source, I think it is important to
> stress that
> $ source .homebrew-build-env
> must be done before
> $ ./configure
> (I h
This looks like https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31403
On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 6:20:11 AM UTC-7 maksm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on Ubuntu 22.04, dual booted to Windows 10 on separate
> partition. The linux build is currently entirely fresh, after reinstalling,
> there's
That's https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33981
On Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 7:13:35 AM UTC-7 maksm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm building latte-distro on ubuntu 22.04 (windows 10 dual boot, Ryzen 7
> 5700h) for apt-installed sage 9.5 . ./configure executes properly but then
> for make ch
>From the crash report:
ImportError: libflint-2.8.5.so: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory
Likely, a system update (apt-get upgrade) removed this version of the
shared library.
Rebuild Sage from scratch.
See also https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34203
On Monday, July 25
On Monday, September 5, 2022 at 1:09:59 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 4:06 AM Nils Bruin wrote:
> > On Sunday, 4 September 2022 at 10:31:42 UTC-7 george...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> >> I am about to submit a math paper to a journal. I would like to include
> a proper ci
Report Ubuntu packaging bugs to Ubuntu
On Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 10:17:31 PM UTC-7 kun.j...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to run sage on WSL2 (Ubuntu focal 20.04.5 LTS), and after a
> fresh install (sadly only version 9.0), running `sage` gives the following
> error.
>
> Mo
but this is quite
>> error-prone.
>>
>> Please use conda, or build from source, or use Linux distro with much
>> more up to date Sage, e.g.
>> archlinux or Gentoo.
>>
>>
>> HTH
>> Dima
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 14
I see the following error in sagelib-*.log:
#define LOCAL_HIREMAINDER register ulong hiremainder
^
sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.cpp:35068:120:
error: use of undeclared identifier 'pTakeOutComp1'; did you mean
'pTakeOutComp'?
Disable Anaconda and read what "./configure" says at the end (these
messages are for you)
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 2:07:52 PM UTC-8 hyunjo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to build Sage 9.8 from source for development; I had
> previously done so months ago, but I had not
The way forward is via CVXpy.
See https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35120 (needs review); next
step: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/31962
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 2:15:00 AM UTC-8 Peter Mueller wrote:
> Even though I installed the optional packages csdp and dsdp in Sage 9.8,
This screenshot is from the "_prereq" spkg, which records the minimal
packages for a from-source build of Sage.
Sage can be built using just the Xcode command-line tools, which is why
nothing is displayed there.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 3:38:12 AM UTC-7 Rishitha Madhavaram wrote:
> [image:
On Monday, March 27, 2023 at 6:34:50 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
In my experience, sagelib needs rebuilding to interface with normaliz (I
think it's "make normaliz pynormaliz" nowadays, or perhaps one needs a pip
install).
No, there is no such build-time dependency. And "make pynormaliz" suffic
On Tuesday, March 28, 2023 at 10:18:23 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
[...] leads me to believe that it's probably nor possible to install
pynormaliz via "make" in a binary distribution.
If you install Sage from a binary distribution, then there is no relation
whatsoever to a source tree of Sage.
On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 1:33:07 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 March 2023 at 13:06:25 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
On Tuesday, March 28, 2023 at 10:18:23 PM UTC-7 Nils Bruin wrote:
[...] leads me to believe that it's probably nor possible to install
pynormaliz via
Try if "make sage_conf" fixes this problem.
If this persists, please post the file "config.log".
On Saturday, April 8, 2023 at 3:19:13 PM UTC-7 Eric Majzoub wrote:
> Thank you, this allows sage to complete the build. However, now I have
> another problem. When I run sage from its install directo
config.log please
On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 3:16:25 PM UTC-7 Matthias Goerner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I can't get sage to work when installing it with conda on a new MacBook
> Pro with M2 chip and Ventura 13.3.
>
> I tried
> conda -n sage create sage=9.X python=3.Y
> for (X,Y) = (5,10), (8,10), (8,
Try "make -j list-broken-packages", which may give instructions how to fix
this
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 7:40:58 PM UTC-7 Jianping Pan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using *SageMath version 10.1.beta1*, and I have dot2tex and graphviz
> installed. I checked that following line produces a nice PDF
The page
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/portability_testing.html#using-our-pre-built-docker-images-for-development-in-vs-code
has a link to a number of more container options
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 3:29:35 PM UTC-7 Beth Claire wrote:
> I saw the cocalc docker, and yeah, it's
Many of these packages appeared in the 10.2 developer's guide only because
of a bug in the script that generates this list.
This is already fixed in the current beta;
see
https://deploy-livedoc--sagemath.netlify.app/html/en/installation/source#debian-ubuntu-package-installation
Nevertheless, t
By the way, a further improvement to this section in the installation guide
is waiting for review in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37056
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 10:13:08 AM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> Many of these packages appeared in the 10.2 developer's guide only
On Wednesday, February 7, 2024 at 7:00:07 AM UTC-8 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
I don't know about any automated way to check that the example notebooks
are up to date.
One can use "jupyter nbconvert --to notebook --execute" for this
https://nbconvert.readthedocs.io/en/latest/execute_api.html
--
This one is fixed in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37646
On Wednesday, March 27, 2024 at 9:58:10 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> I've cut out the interesting part of the log.
> It's a linker error (IMHO the linking should be done with C++, not
> with C compiler, but that's probably OK
Yes, this is documented
in
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/launching.html#setting-up-sagemath-as-a-jupyter-kernel-in-an-existing-jupyter-notebook-or-jupyterlab-installation
On Monday, April 8, 2024 at 11:16:45 AM UTC-7 Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> Setup : Sage 10.4.beta1 runnin
You might be looking
for
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/tensor_free_modules/sage/tensor/modules/tensor_with_indices.html
On Tuesday, April 9, 2024 at 6:59:27 AM UTC-7 Anton Todorov wrote:
> Einsum: https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/generated/numpy.einsum.html
>
> It is a way to
I agree, the problem is that currently we cannot distinguish typo'd doctest
tags from valid doctest tags that are not present.
Part of the solution: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35856
On Thursday, June 13, 2024 at 7:40:27 AM UTC-7 Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> Generalizing the problem of
Which Sage version; logs please.
On Tuesday, July 23, 2024 at 8:28:06 AM UTC-7 Ziyan He wrote:
> When I try to use pip install to install sage-numerical-backends-gurobi, I
> encounter the following error:
>
> Error compiling Cython file:
> ---
cpdef write_mps(self, filename, int modern) noexcept:
> ^
>
>
> sage_numerical_backends_gurobi/gurobi_backend.pyx:1142:14: C method
> 'write_mps' not previously declared in definiti
I would like to get feedback from Sage users on Windows who are familiar
with VS Code regarding a proposed installation procedure for the Sage
Installation Guide.
-
https://doc-pr-37534--sagemath.netlify.app/html/en/installation/#using-visual-studio-code-with-sagemath-dev-containers
--
You rec
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
