Hi,
I have started using sage a short while ago, after playing with
Mathematica for a while, and I'm impressed!
One thing I'm missing is a way to change interact widget rendering in
the browser, from within the code.
So, in the simple example at http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/2409/ (and
also bel
Thank you for the quick response, kcrisman!
On Sep 1, 10:34 am, kcrisman wrote:
> Hi HMark,
>
> I don't think we can currently have controls depending on other
> controls, but there is a ticket for this. Is this what you are asking
> about? Unfortunately, our trac serve
he current, newly modified value
print "The value of", Theta.var(), "has been modified to:",
input_value # exists: wrong, but since we can't get the modified
value...
Thanks,
Mark
> > On Sep 1, 12:21 pm, HMark wrote:
> >> One thing I'm missing is a
example/pointer would be really appreciated.
Thanks,
Mark
On Sep 2, 10:17 am, HMark wrote:
> Thank you, Mitesh.
>
> On Sep 1, 3:59 pm, Mitesh Patel wrote:
>
> > If we added a unique HTML 'id' attribute to the input element, perhaps
> > we could wrap
>
wer
question = question + 1
if operation == 'Check':
print "in check. question=", question, " answer=", user_answer
Thanks for your help and clarification,
HMark.
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.
Hi,
I'd appreciate a pointer to how to resolve what seems to be a timing/
processing issue, where interact is triggered and is processing only
one event (namely the change in the input_box), and ignores another
(the click on the selector button).
Thanks,
HMark.
On Jun 26, 6:
alculations = checkbox(default = false, label = 'Show least
squares calculations:'),
show_best_fit = checkbox(default = false, label = 'Show best
fit:')
):
where only when user_offset is modified, does it grab the values of
n_points_i and user_slope and sends it to the s
behind the GUI to lower the barrier of entry for novices/students as
they explore/learn new math concepts.
Hope it makes sense.
Thanks,
HMark.
On Jul 1, 3:34 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 7/1/11 4:35 PM, HMark wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thank you for the quick reply, Jason.
