calculation. This is very useful in alot of computational situations,
especially combinatorial functions that are defined recursively (like
the fibonacci example given and profiles in the post above).
-BFJ
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sa
That was fast!
Thanks for looking into the problem. I'll be doing more extensive
calculations over the next couple of weeks (I'm porting some Maple
code). I'll let you know if I run into any other problems. I'm excited
about the prospect of a 17-fold performance increase.
Thanks very much,
--
[
Elementary that has a
problem.
Thanks,
BFJ
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/
like using trac?
Thanks,
BFJ
On Jan 16, 4:30 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Jan 16, 10:23 pm, BFJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > First of all, I don't know whether to post about this here, or file a
> > bug rep
ional Field
The same code but for SFASchur results in:
sage: s=SFASchur(QQ)
sage: f=s([2]).expand(2)
sage: f
x0^2 + x0*x1 + x1^2
sage: f.parent()
Multivariate Polynomial Ring in x0, x1 over Rational Field
Thanks,
BFJ
On Jan 17, 1:46 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
o this, or if everyone is busy, maybe
someone can tell me where to look at how values returned from
symmetrica are interpreted and perhaps I can provide a patch.
Thanks,
BFJ
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To uns
Hi Mike,
That makes sense. Thanks. I think I've managed to understand something
small about how this kind of interface works in Sage. Overall I'm very
impressed how easy it is to do things with symmetric poly's in Sage.
It kills Maple :)
Thanks,
-BFJ
On Jan 20, 5:25 pm, "
hing which can be addressed in Sage without modifying
jsMath, I don't know.
-BFJ
On Jan 24, 4:56 pm, "bill.p" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find the warning messages that appear at the top of the notebook
> saying
> that JsMath isn't available annoying. There
he notebook (running sage
2.10.1) the old worksheets don't show up. If I create a new worksheet
and put some lines in it, save and close. The new files show up in
$HOME/.sage/sage_notebook/worksheets/admin/ under the next available
number, so to speak.
I'm trying to figure this out still. Is there a file somewhere that
records which worksheets are displayed in the notebook interface;
somehing besides just the content of the directory
$HOME/.sage/sage_notebook/worksheets/
?
-BFJ
On Feb 12, 12:28 pm, BFJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
l evaluate numerical expressions to a
desired level of accuracy
sage: N(S[0][x].subs(tau0=0.5, tau1=5.0), digits=25)
1.198947636399185334710182
-BFJ
On Mar 16, 5:32 pm, Jose Guzman wrote:
> Hi everybody again.
>
> Does anybody if it is possible to use the result of the function solve
&g
I'm using @interact to make a demo for my calculus students involving
area minimization:
@interact
def _(s=slider(-10,-0.1,0.1,default=-2.5,label='slope')):
html('Try to minimize the area of the triangle whose hypotenuse
passes through (2,3)')
G=line([(0,-2*s+3), (-3/s+2,0)]) #s*(x-2)+3,(x
It seems to me that the issue might be that Sage doesn't understand
how Hom(ZZ^3, ZZ^1) is a (free) module over ZZ. If you could coerce it
into that category, then the object H = Hom(ZZ^3, ZZ^1) would have
generators induced by those of ZZ^3 and ZZ^1 and then specifying a map
in Hom( ZZ^3, Hom( ZZ^
The two expressions you give may be algebraically equivalent, but
they're not identical. There is no canonical "fully simplified" form
for a general algebraic expression, so you can't expect
full_simplify() to output this non-existant form. If the expressions
are simple enough, like polynomials, yo
The part of the reference manual under Pi Axis is relevant:
Pi Axis:
sage: g1 = plot(sin(x), 0, 2*pi)
sage: g2 = plot(cos(x), 0, 2*pi, linestyle = "--")
sage: (g1+g2).show(ticks=pi/6, tick_formatter=pi) # show their sum,
nicely formatted
On Nov 30, 3:36 pm, David Joyner wrote:
> Does the pag
I was going to suggest this too, but the RIF behaves differently than
you might naively expect "intervals" of real number to behave. For
example, "union" means convex hull:
sage: a = RIF(0,1)
sage: b = RIF(2,3)
sage: a.union(b).endpoints()
(0.000, 3.00)
Also, it seems from
I'm not sure why nothing appears and no warning or error is raised. It
may have to do with the type of v[1]. Try this:
{{{
M = matrix(3,[1,-1,-1,-1,3,1,-1,1,3]); v=M.eigenvalues();
x,y,z = var('x,y,z')
Q=implicit_plot3d(x^2+y^2+z^2==RDF(1/v[1]), [x,-3,3], [y,-3,3],
[z,-3,3], opacity=0.5); Q
}}}
I
ntegral( f, 0, pi)
(6.2831854397961235, 1.849638380505561e-07)
sage: N(2*pi)
6.28318530717959
Do:
numerical_integral?
for more info on the numerical_integral function.
BFJ
On Feb 7, 1:02 am, Santanu Sarkar
wrote:
> How one can find integral abs(cos(x+y)) where x varies from 0 to pi
> a
18 matches
Mail list logo
