well i am not sure, they should be, how do i confirm this ?
On Thursday, March 27, 2025 at 1:03:05 PM UTC+5:30 Antonio Rojas wrote:
> This doesn't match what your config.log says:
> [...]
> real_configure:113712: result: cypari: no suitable system package;
> standard, installed SPKG version 2.2.
Thursday, March 27, 2025 at 1:49:09 PM UTC+5:30 Ashutosh Rajora wrote:
> well i am not sure, they should be, how do i confirm this ?
>
> On Thursday, March 27, 2025 at 1:03:05 PM UTC+5:30 Antonio Rojas wrote:
>
>> This doesn't match what your config.log says:
>> [
woahh, now it seems the build is broken and even sage is not working, do i
need to build it again?
On Thursday, March 27, 2025 at 3:10:53 PM UTC+5:30 Ashutosh Rajora wrote:
> I faced an issue while building Sage from source 2-3 weeks, what i ended
> up doing was that whenever i used t
l
>
> and build again
>
>
> On 27 March 2025 11:34:34 GMT-05:00, Ashutosh Rajora <
> ashutosh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> woahh, now it seems the build is broken and even sage is not working, do
>> i need to build it again?
>>
>> On Thursday, March 27, 20
Can anybody please assist with this issue.
On Saturday, March 8, 2025 at 9:50:10 AM UTC+5:30 Ashutosh Rajora wrote:
> how to check this:
>
> " It looks indeed as an insufficient RAM for the C++ compiler.
> Do you have a fixed amount of RAM allocated to WSL? It should better
r 8Gb RAM, make
> it 6 or 8Gb.
>
>
>
> On 8 March 2025 11:00:21 GMT-06:00, Ashutosh Rajora
> wrote:
>
>> Can anybody please assist with this issue.
>>
>> On Saturday, March 8, 2025 at 9:50:10 AM UTC+5:30 Ashutosh Rajora wrote:
>>
>>> how to ch
,sage.rings.polynomial.pbori,sage.rings.real_double,sage.rings.real_mpfr,sage.schemes,sage.symbolic,sagemath_doc_html,scipy,singular,sphinx,sympy,threejs
EigenVector22@LAPTOP-NLAVJRP4:~/sage$
Thanks,
On Sunday, March 9, 2025 at 2:22:40 AM UTC+5:30 Ashutosh Rajora wrote:
Thanks a lot sir
