[sage-support] Unexpected error for asking diagonalizability

2019-11-07 Thread Kwankyu
Hi, This m = matrix(QQ, 3, [1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 3, -2, 1, 2]) m.is_diagonalizable() raises an error rather than giving False. The error message gives an explanation why the matrix is not diagonalizable. But I think the expected result for asking diagonalizability should be either True or False, for

Re: [sage-support] Unexpected error for asking diagonalizability

2019-11-07 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:15 AM Kwankyu wrote: > > Hi, > > This > > m = matrix(QQ, 3, [1, 1, 1, 0, 3, 3, -2, 1, 2]) > m.is_diagonalizable() > > raises an error rather than giving False. The error message gives an > explanation why the matrix is > not diagonalizable. But I think the expected > res

[sage-support] Re: Symbolic inverse in finite field

2019-11-07 Thread Subrata Nandi
Thanks Emmanuel Charpentier for your reply. But the entry of my matrix is only symbolic variables. For example I am giving one short matrix. y=[ [x0 x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9] [x1 x2

[sage-support] Re: Symbolic inverse in finite field

2019-11-07 Thread Subrata Nandi
On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 9:13:17 PM UTC+5:30, Subrata Nandi wrote: > > Thanks Emmanuel Charpentier for your reply. But the entry of my matrix is > only symbolic variables. For example I am giving one short matrix. > R.=Boolean PolynomialRing() > y=[ > > [x0 x1

[sage-support] Re: Symbolic inverse in finite field

2019-11-07 Thread Nils Bruin
On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 7:50:00 AM UTC-8, Subrata Nandi wrote: > > > > On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 9:13:17 PM UTC+5:30, Subrata Nandi wrote: >> >> Thanks Emmanuel Charpentier for your reply. But the entry of my matrix >> is only symbolic variables. For example I am giving one short m

Re: [sage-support] Unexpected error for asking diagonalizability

2019-11-07 Thread saad khalid
This functionality seems to be intended somehow? At least, it is made reference to in the documentation: http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/matrices/sage/matrix/matrix2.html Look at the part after: "A matrix that is not diagonalizable over the rationals, as evidenced by its Jordan form."

Re: [sage-support] Unexpected error for asking diagonalizability

2019-11-07 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:33 AM saad khalid wrote: > > This functionality seems to be intended somehow? At least, it is made > reference to in the documentation: > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/matrices/sage/matrix/matrix2.html > Look at the part after: > "A matrix that is not diagonal