Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building Sage 8.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 :make: *** [all] Error

2018-03-13 Thread slelievre
Tue 2018-03-13 01:52:07 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 12:26:40 AM UTC, mkira...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Thanks for the help guys. >> >> When I changed the drive file system from ntfs to ext4 it cleared past the error. >> Now I am getting >> >> Sage build/upgrade complete!

Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building Sage 8.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 :make: *** [all] Error

2018-03-13 Thread mkiran . 8589
Thanks for the replies. Great help. Now sage is working properly. :) On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 2:15:38 PM UTC+5:30, slelievre wrote: > > Tue 2018-03-13 01:52:07 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: > > > > On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 12:26:40 AM UTC, mkira...@gmail.com wrote: > >> > >> Thanks for the help g

[sage-support] Request for a large download of data

2018-03-13 Thread John Cremona
>From the bug-report spreadsheet: I am a PhD student in Mathematics at Oxford interested in identifying modular forms given their q expansions. To do this it would be useful to have a copy of the `webnewforms` collection listed here https://github.com/LMFDB/lmfdb-inventory/blob/master/db-modularfo

Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building Sage 8.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 :make: *** [all] Error

2018-03-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
OK, so it is fuseblk. Does it mean it's some kind of dual-boot setup, and behind the scenes it is NTFS or something like this? Anyway, you should be able to do your build somewhere on /dev/sda10, ie in a subdirectory of `/` which is not under a mounting point of something else. By the way, the

Re: [sage-support] Re: Error building Sage 8.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 :make: *** [all] Error

2018-03-13 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
2018-03-13 14:05 GMT+01:00 : > > Thanks for the replies. Great help. Now sage is working properly. :) Good that you managed to get a working Sage installation! Dima suggests to post copied and pasted input and output of a terminal session, rather than screenshots. I agree for two reasons: text ma

[sage-support] Has Big-Endian support been deprecated yet?

2018-03-13 Thread Kim Walisch
Hi, We all know that the big-endian CPU architecture is slowly dying, some people even state that "Big-Endian is effectively dead". So my question is: Does sagemath still support big-endian CPU architectures like e.g. 32-bit Sparc? I am asking because there is a ticket (https://trac.sagemath.org

[sage-support] Re: Request for a large download of data

2018-03-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 4:41:02 PM UTC, John Cremona wrote: > > From the bug-report spreadsheet: > > I am a PhD student in Mathematics at Oxford interested in identifying > modular forms given their q expansions. To do this it would be useful to > have a copy of the `webnewforms` collecti

[sage-support] Re: Has Big-Endian support been deprecated yet?

2018-03-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 9:41:50 PM UTC, Kim Walisch wrote: > > Hi, > > We all know that the big-endian CPU architecture is slowly dying, > some people even state that "Big-Endian is effectively dead". > > So my question is: Does sagemath still support big-endian CPU > architectures like e.g

Re: [sage-support] Has Big-Endian support been deprecated yet?

2018-03-13 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2018-03-13 20:33, Kim Walisch wrote: primecount currently only supports little-endian CPUs. That sounds very fishy to me. What are you doing in your code that it supports only little-endian? If your code only works for a particular endianness, it probably means that you are nasty stuff w

Re: [sage-support] Re: Has Big-Endian support been deprecated yet?

2018-03-13 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Dear Kim, As mentioned on the ticket, this big-endian incompatibility does not prevent the inclusion of primecount as an "experimental package" that I still aim to achieve (the type of the package "experimental", "optional" or "standard" is simply a flag). In practice "experimental" means "not of