Dear Sage supporters,
I wrote extensive doc tests for some package. But when I did
sage -t -long -optional __init__.py
apparently *nothing* was tested -- nevertheless it said that all tests
passed.
It even said that all tests passed when I inserted an error on
purpose. So, why does this happen
Dear Sage support,
I am a bit puzzled since very similar things worked in the past.
- I have a Cython extension module in a package that is installed in
SAGE_LOCAL/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ and can be imported when
starting sage, doing
sage: from pGroupCohomology import mtx
- I want to test
hi all,
is there an easy way of creating a subdiagonal matrix, that is with 1
just under the diagonal and 0's elsewhere ? this is for students, we'd
like to convince them that sage is easy, so i'd rather not write a
function myself (which of course would be easy). Apparently (i hear
this from a c
On Jun 19, 12:50 pm, Pierre wrote:
> i know numpy does it, so is it there for sage matrices also ?
i don't think so, how is the numpy syntax? I think this should be an
enhancement to Sage's "sage.matrix.constructor.diagonal_matrix"
function, introducing an "offset" parameter.
H
--~--~-~
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 12:50 pm, Pierre wrote:
>> i know numpy does it, so is it there for sage matrices also ?
>
> i don't think so, how is the numpy syntax? I think this should be an
> enhancement to Sage's "sage.matrix.constructor.diagonal_matrix"
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Simon King wrote:
>
> Dear Sage supporters,
>
> I wrote extensive doc tests for some package. But when I did
> sage -t -long -optional __init__.py
> apparently *nothing* was tested -- nevertheless it said that all tests
> passed.
>
> It even said that all tests pa
Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Jun 19, 12:50 pm, Pierre wrote:
>> i know numpy does it, so is it there for sage matrices also ?
>
> i don't think so, how is the numpy syntax? I think this should be an
> enhancement to Sage's "sage.matrix.constructor.diagonal_matrix"
> function, introducing an "offse
Dear Support,
Just a really quick question - if I want to externally backup my Sage
notebook, I only have to copy the file $HOME/.sage/sage_notebook/
nb.sobj to my external server, correct? Or would I need to tar up the
whole sage_notebook directory, with all its attendant stuff? Thanks!
- kcr
thanks for this. You might be amused by what my colleague said about
SAGE, when we were talking about whether or not using numpy:
"SAGE is like the British train system: you have to worry about which
company to use."
Coming from a french person, this is actually extremely negative. But
i thought
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:32 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> Dear Support,
>
> Just a really quick question - if I want to externally backup my Sage
> notebook, I only have to copy the file $HOME/.sage/sage_notebook/
> nb.sobj to my external server, correct?
NO!!!
> Or would I need to tar up th
>
> > Just a really quick question - if I want to externally backup my Sage
> > notebook, I only have to copy the file $HOME/.sage/sage_notebook/
> > nb.sobj to my external server, correct?
>
> NO!!!
Okay :)
>
> > Or would I need to tar up the
> > whole sage_notebook directory, with a
Dear William,
On 19 Jun., 15:28, William Stein wrote:
> __init__.py and all.py weren't tested because I never put code and
> examples in there, and didn't think anybody else would ever either,
> and wanted to avoid wasting Sage startup time.
I see. The reason for me putting actual code into __
Hi!
On 19 Jun., 18:50, Pierre wrote:
> thanks for this. You might be amused by what my colleague said about
> SAGE, when we were talking about whether or not using numpy:
>
> "SAGE is like the British train system: you have to worry about which
> company to use."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but is
Hi!
On 19 Jun., 10:30, Simon King wrote:
> Note that things worked in the past, when I had the following:
> - mtx.so was in the current directory
> - I set SAGE_PATH to the current directory
> - I did sage -t -long -optional mtx.pyx
>
> What is the difference?
Apparently the difference lies in
14 matches
Mail list logo
