Hi,
I have installed sage-3.0 from pre-compiled binary version in Arch
Linux. It works without any problem.
However, if I compile it from source code using gcc-4.3, I am getting
the following errors when I run the sage after finishing the
compilation successfully:
On Apr 23, 12:18 pm, ugus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Osman,
> I have installed sage-3.0 from pre-compiled binary version in Arch
> Linux. It works without any problem.
> However, if I compile it from source code using gcc-4.3, I am getting
> the following errors when I run the sage aft
I believe they were implemented, since they are in the documentation
at the URL you
gave under "Methods implemented:" but doesn't seem to be there now. Anyway,
you can try this:
sage: maxima.eval("elliptic_kc (0.5)")
'1.854074677301372'
or
sage: RR(maxima.eval("elliptic_kc (0.5)"))
1.854074677301
[Note: If you are interested in announcements only please subscribe to
sage-announce. It is limited to roughly one email every ten days.]
Hello folks,
Sage 3.0 has been released on April 21st, 2008. It is available at
http://sagemath.org/download.html
* About Sage (http://www.sagema
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Helio Perroni Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been trying to use SAGE to find the positive infinity limit of this
> function:
>
> f(x) = ln(x^x) / ln(x!)
>
> However, if I try defining it in SAGE like this:
>
> f(x) = ln(x^x) / ln(factorial(x
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:12 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I believe they were implemented, since they are in the documentation
> at the URL you
> gave under "Methods implemented:" but doesn't seem to be there now. Anyway,
> you can try this:
>
> sage: maxima.eval("elliptic_
* Is there a preferred way to set up a directory for worksheets?
I had some problems with creating worksheets,
which I "solved" by
- creating a directory and setting permissions
- using the directory argument for the notebook
- setting the environmental variable USER to point to it's parent
Prob
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:09 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:12 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I believe they were implemented, since they are in the documentation
> > at the URL you
> > gave under "Methods implemented:" but
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:24 AM, gerhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Is there a preferred way to set up a directory for worksheets?
>
> I had some problems with creating worksheets,
> which I "solved" by
> - creating a directory and setting permissions
> - using the directory argument fo
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jason Grout wrote:
> > Lars Fischer wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>> I think this feature request is reasonable, but the way to
> >>> implement it is to just do it directly instead of including a
> >>> full javascript
Hi,
I haven't been able to 'expand' trigonometric functions in Sage using
identities such as:
sin(x + y) = sin(x)*cos(y) + sin(y)*cos(x)
Is this currently implemented?
Thanks in advance,
--
Hector
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-s
On Apr 23, 6:12 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe they were implemented, since they are in the documentation
> at the URL you
> gave under "Methods implemented:" but doesn't seem to be there now. Anyway,
> you can try this:
>
> sage: maxima.eval("elliptic_kc (0.5)")
> '1.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Hector Villafuerte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I haven't been able to 'expand' trigonometric functions in Sage using
> identities such as:
> sin(x + y) = sin(x)*cos(y) + sin(y)*cos(x)
>
> Is this currently implemented?
sage:
sage: var('x,y')
(x, y)
s
Will you be providing a binary for OS X 10.4 PowerPC?Index of /SAGEbin/apple_osx/powerpc Name Last modified Size Description Parent Directory - README.txt
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Jim Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will you be providing a binary for OS X 10.4 PowerPC?
Unfortunately I no longer have access to *any* OS X 10.5 powerpc machines.
I personally don't own any ppc machines, but I have access to three.
The owners of all three of
Sage does have the Gamma function implemented for real and complex
arguments, but it does not seem able to treat it as a symbolic
function which can be passed to maxima. Is that something which could
be changed?
sage: factorial(5)
120
sage: factorial(5) == gamma(6)
True
sage: gamma(2.3)
1.166711
I'll think about doing it, but it will take me a couple of days to
dedicate the time to the task.
Jim
On Apr 23, 2008, at 9:47 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Jim Clark
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Will you be providing a binary for OS X 10.4 PowerPC?
>
> Unf
Hi,
> > I have installed sage-3.0 from pre-compiled binary version in Arch
> > Linux. It works without any problem.
> > However, if I compile it from source code using gcc-4.3, I am getting
> > the following errors when I run the sage after finishing the
> > compilation successfully:
>
> I
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Hector Villafuerte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> while trying this:
> sage: gap.Factorization?
>
> I got this...
>
> Type:
> Definition: gap.Factorization( [noargspec] )
> Docstring:
> Help: several entries match this topic - type ?2 to get
On Apr 23, 2008, at 12:47 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Jim Clark
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Will you be providing a binary for OS X 10.4 PowerPC?
>
> Unfortunately I no longer have access to *any* OS X 10.5 powerpc
> machines.
> I personally don't own a
Hi:
This is a problem:
sage: CC(spherical_harmonic(1,1,RR(pi/2),RR(pi/2)))
-1.20627379501958e-15 + 0.345494149471335*I
sage: CC(spherical_harmonic(1,1,pi/2,pi/2))
0.130735417217099 + 0.285662098159486*I
Does anyone know what is going on here?
meval is a function in
http://www.sagemath.org/hg/sa
http://Crunchy.sf.net uses editarea,
and they had a rough test on FF3 with no complains on editor
http://groups.google.com/group/crunchy-discuss
there's a screenshot
http://popmokslas.projektas.lt/failai/etc/CrunchyEditor%e2%80%93FF.png
and js
http://www.koders.com/javascript/fidC214ECA4C1C5462D
Hello all,
I've posted a patch up on trac:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2519
And I've decided to move the technical discussion to sage-devel:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/b6fcc3a134abe22c
Take care,
Franco
--
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 1:07 P
Hi
I was going through a book(on quantum computation) , which uses tensor
products. I wanted to experiment with these tensor products. Is there
any function like tensor_product(), which will take 2 or more vectors
as input and return their tensor product?
I tried to search but I couldn't find an
Hello,
I was just playing around with Sage, and I tried to animate
sphere().
Is this not implemented yet?
What I did was this:
L = [sphere((0,i,0))for i in range(10)]
a = animate(L)
a.show()
with each line in a different cell.
After a = animate(L) it graphed the last entry in L
and after a.s
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Alyson Deines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I was just playing around with Sage, and I tried to animate
> sphere().
> Is this not implemented yet?
> What I did was this:
>
> L = [sphere((0,i,0))for i in range(10)]
>
> a = animate(L)
>
> a.show()
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:39 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Hector Villafuerte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I haven't been able to 'expand' trigonometric functions in Sage using
> > identities such as:
> > sin(x + y) = s
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Hector Villafuerte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:39 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Hector Villafuerte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I haven't been
>
> I can do this tonight, and I'm happy to do it on a regular basis.
>
> david
This is very kind. My PPC takes MANY hours to compile Sage due to
lack of RAM, and when there are changes I want to try out the binary
is really helpful. I imagine a fair number of "quiet" users also
still have 10.4
I recently installed sage on a Fedora Core 6 machine,
and it appears that sage only runs when SELinux (secure linux) is
disabled.
When I run it w/ SELINUX=enforcing in /etc/sysconfig/selinux,
I get "cannot restore segment prot after reloc: Permission denied"
when I start sage.
Is this the case,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I recently installed sage on a Fedora Core 6 machine,
> and it appears that sage only runs when SELinux (secure linux) is
> disabled.
>
> When I run it w/ SELINUX=enforcing in /etc/sysconfig/selinux,
> I get "c
On Apr 23, 7:02 pm, "Andrzej Giniewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > I have installed sage-3.0 from pre-compiled binary version in Arch
> > > Linux. It works without any problem.
> > > However, if I compile it from source code using gcc-4.3, I am getting
> > > the following erro
You can do so with matrices (so think of vectors as 1xn or nx1
matrices...):
sage: M = matrix(ZZ, [[1,0],[0,1]])
sage: N = matrix(ZZ, [[1,2],[3,4]])
sage: M.tensor_product(N)
[1 2|0 0]
[3 4|0 0]
[---+---]
[0 0|1 2]
[0 0|3 4]
On Apr 23, 11:14 am, vivek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was
This would surely be easy to implement for vectors: if v and w have
respective entries v[i] for i in range(m), and w[j] for j in range(n)
then v.tensor_product(w) would have m*n entries v[i]*w[j] index by k
in range(m*n) where k=n*i+j. The only issue is whether i moves faster
than j instead (k
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jason Grout
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jason Grout wrote:
>> > Lars Fischer wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >>> I think this feature request is reasonable, but the way to
>> >>> implement it is to just do it directly instead of includ
Hi,
> > interesting, I built sage successfully and don't have those errors -
> > using Arch and no SAGE_ANYTHING environment variables... I noticed I
> > have other release data - was you trying 3.0 (later release - there
> > was second release, wasn't it?) - anyway - there's proof it works f
On Apr 23, 11:12 pm, "Andrzej Giniewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Andrzej,
> > > interesting, I built sage successfully and don't have those errors -
> > > using Arch and no SAGE_ANYTHING environment variables... I noticed I
> > > have other release data - was you trying 3.0 (later
Adam Getchell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:55 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Adam
> Now, if we could get a port to OpenBSD (with privsep), I'd be less
> concerned with the security of the system. ;-)
Build a VMWare image, get it to William and I will take care of the
re
> Hi
>
> I was going through a book(on quantum computation) , which uses
> tensor
> products. I wanted to experiment with these tensor products. Is there
> any function like tensor_product(), which will take 2 or more vectors
> as input and return their tensor product?
>
> I tried to searc
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> William Stein wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Jason Grout
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Jason Grout wrote:
> >> > Lars Fischer wrote:
> >> >> Hello,
> >> >>
> >> >>> I think this feature re
Thanks a lot.
With all the hints given, I am able to do all things that I initially
intended to do.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more o
41 matches
Mail list logo
