Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-17 Thread Dima Pasechnik
most probably it had to do with Python's int becoming long int (ones displayed with L at the end by the usual Python shell) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a

Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread fanxuejun
That means when the length of bite is more than 62, Sage will change its type of data or the storage method..Right? 在 2018年4月16日星期一 UTC+8下午9:15:41,vdelecroix写道: > > On 16/04/2018 15:09, Vincent Delecroix wrote: > > On 16/04/2018 13:15, John Cremona wrote: > >> On 16 April 2018 at 12:04, Vincen

Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread fanxuejun
sorry, I made a mistake in the value of p. In fact p==68235916425158872634563027. That is a prime 在 2018年4月16日星期一 UTC+8下午7:07:29,vdelecroix写道: > > On 16/04/2018 09:21, fanx...@iie.ac.cn wrote: > > I have constructed a big prime field: > >>> p=68235916425158872634653027 > >>> F=GF(p) > > Her

Re: Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread fanxue...@iie.ac.cn
Sorrry, I make a mistake in the value p. The value of p is 68235916425158872634563027. fanxue...@iie.ac.cn From: Vincent Delecroix Date: 2018-04-16 19:04 To: sage-support Subject: Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field On 16/04/2018 09:21, fanxue...@iie.ac.cn wrote: >

Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread Vincent Delecroix
fixed at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25182 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group

Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread Vincent Delecroix
On 16/04/2018 15:09, Vincent Delecroix wrote: On 16/04/2018 13:15, John Cremona wrote: On 16 April 2018 at 12:04, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: On 16/04/2018 09:21, fanxue...@iie.ac.cn wrote: I have constructed  a big prime field: p=68235916425158872634653027 F=GF(p

Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread Vincent Delecroix
On 16/04/2018 13:15, John Cremona wrote: On 16 April 2018 at 12:04, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: On 16/04/2018 09:21, fanxue...@iie.ac.cn wrote: I have constructed a big prime field: p=68235916425158872634653027 F=GF(p) Here is what I get sage: p = 68235916425

Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread John Cremona
On 16 April 2018 at 12:04, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16/04/2018 09:21, fanxue...@iie.ac.cn wrote: > >> I have constructed a big prime field: >> >>> p=68235916425158872634653027 F=GF(p) >>> > Here is what I get > > sage: p = 68235916425158872634653027 > sa

Re: [sage-support] scalar restriction in extension field

2018-04-16 Thread Vincent Delecroix
On 16/04/2018 09:21, fanxue...@iie.ac.cn wrote: I have constructed a big prime field: p=68235916425158872634653027 F=GF(p) Here is what I get sage: p = 68235916425158872634653027 sage: F = GF(p) Traceback (most recent call last): ... ValueError: the order of a finite field must be a prime po