On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 at 04:06PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> Did anybody write (or consider writing) the other approach to this,
> which is a tex file
> that gets processed directly by sage to make another tex file, which
> is then compiled.
> This is trickier for tools, but recently Harald pointed
On Friday, September 13, 2013 12:06:18 AM UTC+1, William wrote:
> Did anybody write (or consider writing) the other approach to this,
> which is a tex file
> that gets processed directly by sage to make another tex file, which
> is then compiled.
Thats even more ugly than what we already do.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 at 11:51AM -0600, David Roe wrote:
>> I'm trying to write some sagetex code that generates row reduction examples
>> for matrices and I ran into a compatibility problem that seems to be
>> different from the ones
Hi David,
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 at 11:51AM -0600, David Roe wrote:
> I'm trying to write some sagetex code that generates row reduction examples
> for matrices and I ran into a compatibility problem that seems to be
> different from the ones described in section 4.1 of the Sagetex manual.
> Here's a
I'm trying to write some sagetex code that generates row reduction examples
for matrices and I ran into a compatibility problem that seems to be
different from the ones described in section 4.1 of the Sagetex manual.
Here's a minimal example:
\documentclass{beamer}
\usepackage{sagetex}
\begin{doc
For what it is worth, this works:
\documentclass{beamer}
\usepackage{sagetex}
\begin{document}
\begin{sagesilent}
G = r"""\begin{frame} Hello World \end{frame}"""
\end{sagesilent}
\sagestr{G}
\end{document}
You might be able to put all the contents of the sages
