[sage-support] packages

2020-11-12 Thread Cyrille Piatecki
There are some distinction between Sagecell and Sagemath notebooks. For instance the option "simpy" of "solve" does not work with Sagecel. Why ? I have also observe that under Lin ux the current version is Sagemath 9.2. Is it the current Sagecell version (I dont think so) ? Under Windows we are

Re: [sage-support] packages failed to install

2020-02-11 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:55 PM varenyam bakshi wrote: > > Makefile:39: recipe for target 'build/make/Makefile' failed > make[1]: *** [build/make/Makefile] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/varenyam/SageMath' > Makefile:31: recipe for target 'base-toolchain' failed > make: *** [base-tool

[sage-support] packages failed to install

2020-02-11 Thread varenyam bakshi
Makefile:39: recipe for target 'build/make/Makefile' failed make[1]: *** [build/make/Makefile] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/varenyam/SageMath' Makefile:31: recipe for target 'base-toolchain' failed make: *** [base-toolchain] Error 2 xubuntu 64 bit running as virtual machine in a wind

Re: [sage-support] Packages needed for self-compiled Sage on Ubuntu

2016-01-06 Thread Henri Girard
Maybe installing ppa sagemath-dev allows you to get deps on ubuntu : sudo apt-get build-dep sage, that's what I do to compile sagemath Le 06/01/2016 11:36, Jori Mäntysalo a écrit : On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: Is there a list somewhere on Ubuntu packages that are needed to instal

Re: [sage-support] Packages needed for self-compiled Sage on Ubuntu

2016-01-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-01-06 11:36, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: "Everything that is supposed to work without optional packages (installed with sage -i) really works."? That doesn't help. It just reformulates the problem to defining "supposed to work without optional packages". -- You received this message becaus

Re: [sage-support] Packages needed for self-compiled Sage on Ubuntu

2016-01-06 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: Is there a list somewhere on Ubuntu packages that are needed to install fully working Sage from source? The hard part here is defining "fully working". "Everything that is supposed to work without optional packages (installed with sage -i) really wo

Re: [sage-support] Packages needed for self-compiled Sage on Ubuntu

2016-01-06 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-01-06 11:10, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: Is there a list somewhere on Ubuntu packages that are needed to install fully working Sage from source? The hard part here is defining "fully working". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group.

[sage-support] Packages needed for self-compiled Sage on Ubuntu

2016-01-06 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
Is there a list somewhere on Ubuntu packages that are needed to install fully working Sage from source? For example now I have a machine where view() does not work as LaTeX has no tikz. Instead of every admin to do the same job it would be nice to have a copy-and-paste help. -- Jori Mäntysal

[sage-support] Packages and Full installation

2009-05-30 Thread Josh
I'm just wondering about ordering the DVD. Does that come with all the additional packages (minus experimental)? This is a fairly trivial question, but I just want to install everything just to be able to show it off to my heavily pro-mathematica math department. --~--~-~--~~