On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:36 PM, jtyard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if this counts as a bug, so sorry if I'm posting this to
> the wrong list. Say I define a cyclotomic field in Sage as follows:
>
> sage: Q3 = CyclotomicField(3)
> sage: z3 = Q3.0
>
> Then Sage can compute the complex conjugate
Hi,
I don't know if this counts as a bug, so sorry if I'm posting this to
the wrong list. Say I define a cyclotomic field in Sage as follows:
sage: Q3 = CyclotomicField(3)
sage: z3 = Q3.0
Then Sage can compute the complex conjugate independent of an
embedding into the complexes:
sage: z3.conju