On 06/11/2010 10:59 PM, Jeff Post wrote:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 21:59, Jan Groenewald wrote:
xppaut has always been very fast at DE solving,
I tried compiling xppaut on CentOS 4.8 and make issues this error:
make: *** No rule to make target `parserslow2.o', needed by `xppaut'. St
On Thursday 10 June 2010 21:59, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> xppaut has always been very fast at DE solving,
>
I tried compiling xppaut on CentOS 4.8 and make issues this error:
make: *** No rule to make target `parserslow2.o', needed by `xppaut'. Stop.
After editing the Makefile to fix that probl
Hi
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:07:04AM +0200, Jose Guzman wrote:
> Thanks for the nice replies!
>
> I think I will give XPP a try. The syntax does not look complicated. One
> of the first things I will try is to write some Python routines to read
> the XPP output to plot it within Matplotlib. M
Thanks for the nice replies!
I think I will give XPP a try. The syntax does not look complicated. One
of the first things I will try is to write some Python routines to read
the XPP output to plot it within Matplotlib. Maybe in a long run, I
could try to include some XPP in Sage. Rob, would it
Hi
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:01:38PM +0200, Jose Guzman wrote:
> I am going to take a course on computational neuroscience soon. Tutors
> suggested us to use xppaut (or similar) to solve ODEs. Since I am a
> little bit more familiar with Sage, I was wondering if I could simply
> use Sage in
Dear Sage users,
I am going to take a course on computational neuroscience soon. Tutors
suggested us to use xppaut (or similar) to solve ODEs. Since I am a
little bit more familiar with Sage, I was wondering if I could simply
use Sage in stead of xppaut. I would really appreciate if somebody w
