Some documentation of maxima's to_poly_solve command is on
> http://maxima.sourceforge.net/docs/manual/de/maxima_75.html,
> about 3/4th down the page.
>
>
>
Thanks. But is there other way to solve this particular equation ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:04 AM, sundar wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am newbie to sagemath. I have windows 8 and sage version is 6.4.1. I am
> running it inside virtualbox.
> I was reading some thing about solving equations on sage website at
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/calculus/sage/symbolic/
Hello
I am newbie to sagemath. I have windows 8 and sage version is 6.4.1. I am
running it inside virtualbox.
I was reading some thing about solving equations on sage website at
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/calculus/sage/symbolic/relation.html
At one point author is trying to demonstra
I would like to print/show all the possible solutions of a system of
equations, more specifically:
sage:x,y,z = var('x,y,z')
sage:eqn =
solve([(0.5*(1/(sqrt(x^4+y^4-2*x^3*y-2*x*y^3+3*x^2*y^2-5*x^2-5*y^2+6*x*y+9)))*(4*x^3-6*x^2*y-2*y^3+6*x*y^2-10*x+6*y))==0,
(0.5*(1/(sqrt(x^4+y^4-2*x^3*y-2*x*y
On Wed, 28 May 2014 at 08:14AM -0700, George Hokke wrote:
> Hi,
> what I want to do is to solve an equation in which the function contains a
> numerical integral in its definition.
> Something like this:
>
> sage: d=lambda y: numerical_integral(x**2+y,0,1)[0]
> sage: d(0)
> 0.
>
> wo
Hi,
what I want to do is to solve an equation in which the function contains a
numerical integral in its definition.
Something like this:
sage: d=lambda y: numerical_integral(x**2+y,0,1)[0]
sage: d(0)
0.
works until here.
But now I'd want to do:
sage: solve(d(y)==1,y)
ValueError: In
> The problem is rounding error. Over the rationals:
>
> sage: A = matrix(3, 3, [QQ(a) for a in [1, 0.106, 1.212, 3.8759765625,
> 0.04801171875, 3.972, 3.0625, 0.09325, 3.249]])
> sage: A
> [ 1 53/500 303/250]
> [ 3969/1024 12291/256000 993/250]
> [ 49/16 373
> On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 10:19:58 AM UTC-7, einek wrote:
>>
>> Hi tvn,
>>
>> Am Montag, den 17.01.2011, 14:22 -0800 schrieb tvn:
>> > I try to solve for 3 variables x y z with 3 equations as below ,
>> > I am expecting something like z = r1, x = -r1, y = -2*r1 but instead
>> > get x = y =
On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 10:19:58 AM UTC-7, einek wrote:
>
> Hi tvn,
>
> Am Montag, den 17.01.2011, 14:22 -0800 schrieb tvn:
> > I try to solve for 3 variables x y z with 3 equations as below ,
> > I am expecting something like z = r1, x = -r1, y = -2*r1 but instead
> > get x = y = z = 0 (
Hi tvn,
Am Montag, den 17.01.2011, 14:22 -0800 schrieb tvn:
> I try to solve for 3 variables x y z with 3 equations as below ,
> I am expecting something like z = r1, x = -r1, y = -2*r1 but instead
> get x = y = z = 0 (which trivially valid though not expected). Is
> this because the numbers
I try to solve for 3 variables x y z with 3 equations as below , I am
expecting something like z = r1, x = -r1, y = -2*r1 but instead get x = y
= z = 0 (which trivially valid though not expected). Is this because the
numbers used too complex (equation 2) and have some rounding errors ?
11 matches
Mail list logo