Re: [sage-support] RealSet Problem

2015-10-24 Thread Volker Braun
The docstring issue is fixed in http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19475 On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 8:47:58 PM UTC+2, William wrote: > > I don't know. The ? help for RealSet it epically horrible. Why is > this so utterly broken? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [sage-support] RealSet Problem

2015-10-23 Thread Nathann Cohen
> > As long as symbolics gets ignored by most devs such errors will persist. > You should try adding stopgap. That helps people notice. Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: [sage-support] RealSet Problem

2015-10-22 Thread Ralf Stephan
On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 8:47:58 PM UTC+2, William wrote: > > sage: RLF(pi+1) < RLF(pi) > True # umh, no! As long as symbolics gets ignored by most devs such errors will persist. The above is due to sage: (pi+1).__cmp__(pi) -1 The main ticket for this is http://trac.sagemath.org/ti

Re: [sage-support] RealSet Problem

2015-10-21 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Liu Yue wrote: > I'm using sage 6.8. > > After I typed: RealSet(pi,pi+1), the answer I got is: (pi+1, pi). > > Furthermore: RealSet(pi,pi+1).lower() returns pi+1; RealSet(pi,pi+1).upper() > returns pi. > > Is there anything wrong? I don't know. The ? help for Rea

[sage-support] RealSet Problem

2015-10-21 Thread Liu Yue
I'm using sage 6.8. After I typed: RealSet(pi,pi+1), the answer I got is: (pi+1, pi). Furthermore: RealSet(pi,pi+1).lower() returns pi+1; RealSet(pi,pi+1).upper() returns pi. Is there anything wrong? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support"