Hi Mariah,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Mariah wrote:
> I respectfully suggest that this section be split out to a "How to
> make
> a Sage patch (for newbies)" ... or at the very least moved to the
> beginning
> of the Developers' Guide.
This is now ticket #6987
http://trac.sagemath.or
Minh,
> Tutorials, tips and techniques on making and managing patches should
> go in the Developers' Guide at
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/
Aha! This already has the stuff I was going to write up.
The reason that I never looked at this is that I do not consider
myself
a "developer
Hi Mariah,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Mariah wrote:
> Is there a "How to make a Sage patch (for newbies)" page anywhere?
> If not, there should be.
The sage-combinat team has a wiki page on using Mercurial for making patches:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/MercurialStepByStep
The
Dan,
As you suggested, I took a look at the Mercurial website and
quickly found that putting the following in my .hgrc file
would make hg use my email address rather than
'mar...@localhost.localdomain'
[ui]
username = Mariah Lenox
> You sound like you're pretty comfortable with the basic diff
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 at 07:22AM -0700, Mariah wrote:
> Note that the first time I did "$ hg ci" I had to edit the file
> that my editor threw up to remove leading "HG" in some
> lines. When I repeat the command, I now get
>
> No username found, using 'mar...@localhost.localdomain' instead
>
> I a
Hi Mariah,
On 16 Sep., 15:29, Minh Nguyen wrote:
[...]
> Do you mean producing a proper patch file using Mercurial? If yes,
> then you can use the Mercurial that's shipped with Sage like so. From
> SAGE_ROOT, you can do something along the lines of the following
> terminal session:
>
> [mv...@sa
On Sep 16, 2009, at 7:22 AM, Mariah wrote:
> Minh,
>
> Ok, how does the following look? Like what you want?
> The date looks funny.
>
>
> # HG changeset patch
> # User mariah.le...@gmail.com
> # Date 1253110290 14400
> # Node ID 299c98
Minh,
Ok, how does the following look? Like what you want?
The date looks funny.
# HG changeset patch
# User mariah.le...@gmail.com
# Date 1253110290 14400
# Node ID 299c98688ef9ab55662e33f9b9e074de803de4c4
# Parent 684eea91ff224e5bc
Hi Mariah,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Mariah wrote:
> What I do not know how to do is to indicate that this is for the file
>
> sage-4.1.1/sage/misc/misc.py
>
> in
>
> spkg/standard/sage-4.1.1.spkg
>
> Is there a convention as to how to indicate this?
Do you mean producing a proper
Second attempt. Embarrassing typo in my first attempt.
-
--- misc.py.orig 2009-09-15 16:25:22.983553000 -0400
+++ misc.py 2009-09-15 16:28:47.335875000 -0400
@@ -1001,8 +1001,8 @@
.. note
William,
> The file misc.py has this line:
>
> sxrange = xsrange
Ah, yes. I should have looked at the source code. Apologies.
> Any chance you could post a patch with a statement that they are
> aliases added to the docs?
How about:
--
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Sep 15, 2009, at 11:28 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> You might have some thought about this... at least I think it might be
>> caused by your optimizations to [a..b]. This is really a question from ccr,
>> by the way...
>>
>> Forwarde
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Mariah Lenox wrote:
>
> Perhaps I do not understand sxrange / xsrange correctly. The
> reference manual entries for them seem to be similar. Is
> there a difference? (If one is just an alias for the other,
> it would be best to say so. If they are different, t
13 matches
Mail list logo
