On 12/03/2012 07:42 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
On Monday, December 3, 2012 6:19:18 AM UTC-5, P Purkayastha wrote:
I don't know of any nice way of converting the variables to symbolic
variables.
For the record, you can just cast to SR (the symbolic ring):
sage: R. = PolynomialRing(QQ)
sag
On Monday, December 3, 2012 6:19:18 AM UTC-5, P Purkayastha wrote:
> I don't know of any nice way of converting the variables to symbolic
> variables.
>
For the record, you can just cast to SR (the symbolic ring):
sage: R. = PolynomialRing(QQ)
sage: g1 = SR(g1)
sage: g2 = SR(g2)
sage: solve_in
I don't know of any nice way of converting the variables to symbolic
variables.
Even if you did compute the polynomials p1 and p2, and even if you did
manage to put it in the solve_* expressions after converting the
variables, the answer that you will get as the solution will not belong
to t
The patch in the ticket seemed to only address making the error messages
better. Is there some mechanism to convert p1 and p2 to symbolic based
polynomials in the below code
R. = PolynomialRing(QQ)
...
# long sequence of calculations to compute polynomials p1 and p2
...
solve_ineq([p1 > 0, p2 >
On 12/03/2012 09:44 AM, Cary Cherng wrote:
I tried using solve_ineq in the notebook in the simple way below and got
an error. It seems to be related to
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11520
Is there a workaround?
R. = PolynomialRing(QQ)
solve_ineq([g1 > g2],[g1,g2])
Traceback (most re
