If it works don't fix. I like 3.2.2 because of the output in a
textarea is nicer than 4.0. I will leave it along.
On Jul 10, 10:19 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2009, at 9:13 AM, Mikie wrote:
>
> > I am using 3.2.2 sage. Will this fix work?
>
> No idea, but it might. You can try it
On Jul 10, 2009, at 9:13 AM, Mikie wrote:
> I am using 3.2.2 sage. Will this fix work?
No idea, but it might. You can try it out.
> The work around is
> working for me and I would like not to damage the 40 stat functions I
> have created.
Are you talking about modifications to the library it
I am using 3.2.2 sage. Will this fix work? The work around is
working for me and I would like not to damage the 40 stat functions I
have created.
Thanks
On Jul 10, 3:10 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 9 Jul 2009, at 15:02, William
On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>
> On 9 Jul 2009, at 15:02, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Mikie
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert, how do I update my sage installation when you create a
>>> patch. Do I have to reinstall Sage?
>>> Thanx
>>
>> I just did
>>
>>
On 9 Jul 2009, at 15:02, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Mikie
> wrote:
>>
>> Robert, how do I update my sage installation when you create a
>> patch. Do I have to reinstall Sage?
>> Thanx
>
> I just did
>
> sage:
> hg_sage.apply('http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/at
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:12 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:02 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Mikie wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert, how do I update my sage installation when you create a
>>> patch. Do I have to reinstall Sage?
>>> Thanx
>>
>> I just did
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:02 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Mikie wrote:
>>
>> Robert, how do I update my sage installation when you create a
>> patch. Do I have to reinstall Sage?
>> Thanx
>
> I just did
>
> sage:
> hg_sage.apply('http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Mikie wrote:
>
> Robert, how do I update my sage installation when you create a
> patch. Do I have to reinstall Sage?
> Thanx
I just did
sage:
hg_sage.apply('http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/5081/5081-numpy-types.patch')
sage: quit
sage -
Robert, how do I update my sage installation when you create a
patch. Do I have to reinstall Sage?
Thanx
On Jul 9, 5:37 am, Ahmed Fasih wrote:
> Jason, Robert, I'm trying to understand the patch, but it looks like
> this is a fix for *all* Numpy/Scipy-Sage type issues? If so---oh happy
> day!
Jason, Robert, I'm trying to understand the patch, but it looks like
this is a fix for *all* Numpy/Scipy-Sage type issues? If so---oh happy
day!
On Jul 9, 5:53 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> Ahmed Fasih wrote:
> > Writing your own is a good way to understand the implementation issues
> > that we somet
Ahmed Fasih wrote:
> Writing your own is a good way to understand the implementation issues
> that we sometimes unthinkingly rely on, but for production code, it's
> always a good idea to default to the pre-packaged implementation.
>
> In this case, I think it's the standard issue with Scipy not
On Jul 6, 2009, at 2:21 PM, Mikie wrote:
> Yes, I am calling Scipy functions from a standard Python, thus no
> preparser. It does not recognize 1r, 10r, etc.
> Is there anyway to get it to work? I have also tried R, but r.binom
> does not work.
An example, including the error message, would be
Yes, I am calling Scipy functions from a standard Python, thus no
preparser. It does not recognize 1r, 10r, etc.
Is there anyway to get it to work? I have also tried R, but r.binom
does not work.
On Jul 6, 3:16 pm, Ahmed Fasih wrote:
> If you're calling Scipy functions from a standard Python e
Maybe you can use:
sage: RealNumber=float; Integer=int
or, explicitly define the number type when calling the scipy function.
Good luck,
Kevin Horton
On 6 Jul 2009, at 15:57, Mikie wrote:
>
> Ahmed,
>
> Looks good, but I am creating a function in python that is called.
> And 1r, .56r ,etc. d
If you're calling Scipy functions from a standard Python environment,
you won't have the pre-processor issues, so I may be misunderstanding
what your underlying problem is.
Assuming you are in Sage (since this is a Sage mailing list) and
calling Scipy, other options that achieve the same effect a
Kevin,
It worked.
Thanks, a lot.
On Jul 6, 3:33 pm, Kevin Horton wrote:
> Maybe you can use:
>
> sage: RealNumber=float; Integer=int
>
> or, explicitly define the number type when calling the scipy function.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Kevin Horton
>
> On 6 Jul 2009, at 15:57, Mikie wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >
Ahmed,
Looks good, but I am creating a function in python that is called.
And 1r, .56r ,etc. does not pass. I am taking these parameters from a
form and then using the function.
Is there a work-a-round?
Thanks
On Jul 3, 6:19 pm, Ahmed Fasih wrote:
> This is also an excellent resource: "How To
This is also an excellent resource: "How To Ask Questions The Smart
Way," by the peerless Eric Steven Raymond:
http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Jul 3, 8:17 pm, Ahmed Fasih wrote:
> Writing your own is a good way to understand the implementation issues
> that we sometimes unthinki
Writing your own is a good way to understand the implementation issues
that we sometimes unthinkingly rely on, but for production code, it's
always a good idea to default to the pre-packaged implementation.
In this case, I think it's the standard issue with Scipy not
understanding Sage types. Thi
I am trying to use the binomial pmf function in Scipy. Forget the
question I will write my own.
Thanx
On Jul 3, 9:32 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Mikie wrote:
>
> > What is the syntax to get the binomial function in Scipy to calculate?
> > I have tried stats.binom.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Mikie wrote:
>
> What is the syntax to get the binomial function in Scipy to calculate?
> I have tried stats.binom.pmf(1,10,.56,0) etc.
> Thanks for the help.
(1) I don't understand the question. What does your question mean?
(2) Possibly you should also ask on
21 matches
Mail list logo
