On Feb 8, 12:08 pm, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 8, 2011 5:43:36 PM UTC+1, Thomas Scofield wrote:
>
> > Could these two areas be decoupled?
>
> It could be, but the future plans are a bit into the opposite direction. One
> cool thing is to publish @interacts. This means, there
On Tuesday, February 8, 2011 5:43:36 PM UTC+1, Thomas Scofield wrote:
>
>
> Could these two areas be decoupled?
>
It could be, but the future plans are a bit into the opposite direction. One
cool thing is to publish @interacts. This means, there are cells that are
read only, but have an activ
I appreciate the efforts that are under way to make sagenb.org more usable en
masse. I'll patiently wait for the improvements to take effect. In my
ignorance, let me pose a related question. It seems to me the published
notebooks are far different entities than those that are "active". Am I
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 01:05, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> Should we point this to one of the other servers, given the less than
> ideal user experience when the main one?
I've updated it, it points to demo.sagenb.org now.
H
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Harald Schilly
> wrote:
>> On Monday, February 7, 2011 7:52:52 PM UTC+1, robertwb wrote:
>>>
>>> Sage is a victim of its own success!
>>
>> I think it's really great that there is an online notebook to try s
On Feb 7, 7:05 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Harald Schilly
> wrote:
> > On Monday, February 7, 2011 7:52:52 PM UTC+1, robertwb wrote:
>
> >> Sage is a victim of its own success!
>
> > I think it's really great that there is an online notebook to try sage, but
>
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Monday, February 7, 2011 7:52:52 PM UTC+1, robertwb wrote:
>>
>> Sage is a victim of its own success!
>
> I think it's really great that there is an online notebook to try sage, but
> we should post a warning that this is not intended for
On Monday, February 7, 2011 7:52:52 PM UTC+1, robertwb wrote:
>
> Sage is a victim of its own success!
>
I think it's really great that there is an online notebook to try sage, but
we should post a warning that this is not intended for "serious" work and we
are working on it.
Related to that, I
> Alpha seems better, but is there a way to mover over/sync your notebooks from
> the main server?
Not yet (though I suppose someone with root access might be able to
move your login credentials with a lot of effort...), but you should
be able to just download all Sage worksheets you care about a
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 2/7/11 11:59 AM, Thomas Scofield wrote:
>>
>> I've spent the last couple of hours frustrated at trying to log in
>> and use notebooks at sagenb.org. I was attempting to do this while
>> teaching a class, and had little to no success between
On 2/7/11 11:59 AM, Thomas Scofield wrote:
I've spent the last couple of hours frustrated at trying to log in
and use notebooks at sagenb.org. I was attempting to do this while
teaching a class, and had little to no success between 10:30 and
12:20 EST (U.S.). I had this same experience about a
11 matches
Mail list logo
