Yes, I recompiled it and it works. It took 7 hours on the P4.
On Apr 27, 9:53 am, Mikie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just put Sage3.4.1 on and I am getting "line 198: 3626 Illegral
> instruction sage-ip0ython "#@" -i.". Do you think I should get the
> source and recompile it?
> Mikie
>
> On Apr 25, 1:01
Hi,
I just put Sage3.4.1 on and I am getting "line 198: 3626 Illegral
instruction sage-ip0ython "#@" -i.". Do you think I should get the
source and recompile it?
Mikie
On Apr 25, 1:01 am, mabshoff wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2:55 pm, mabshoff
> dortmund.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Sage 3.4.1 which bina
On Apr 24, 2:55 pm, mabshoff wrote:
Hi,
> Sage 3.4.1 which binaries I should post in the next couple hours has
> been build to use only SSE2, so that one should work for you.
Who would have thought, but it took longer than planned. Anyway, 32 as
well as 64 bit SSE2 only Centos binaries are i
On Apr 24, 2:33 pm, Mikie wrote:
> Sage is trying to modify the file sage-flags.txt.
It should open it read only, but let me check.
> On Apr 24, 3:29 pm, Mikie wrote:
>
> > Version 3.4 for CentOS rel 5_2. Before I get the error below it says
> > "Warning; Sage was built on a machine that d
Sage is trying to modify the file sage-flags.txt.
On Apr 24, 3:29 pm, Mikie wrote:
> Version 3.4 for CentOS rel 5_2. Before I get the error below it says
> "Warning; Sage was built on a machine that does not support
> instructions for this computer. Processor flags not on this
> computer: pn
Version 3.4 for CentOS rel 5_2. Before I get the error below it says
"Warning; Sage was built on a machine that does not support
instructions for this computer. Processor flags not on this
computer: pni
On Apr 24, 3:04 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> On Apr 24, 10:49 am, Mikie wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Ju
On Apr 24, 10:49 am, Mikie wrote:
Hi,
> Just installed Sage on CentOS 5.3 server. Local system. I am getting
> "sage-sage: line 197 6520 Illegal instruction sage-ipyth "$@" -i".
> Any help would be appreciated.
What Sage release precisely are you using, i.e. version, binary name,
etc? If i
