>On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:23 PM, wrote:
> If the binaries are functional independent of different linux distributions,
> why would sagemath release binaries for fedora 16, ubuntu 10, 12, and debian
> 7 seperately? Why not to release one binary for linux instead? Also, why it
> is fedora 16 an
> Binary is a completely functional program without any installer is
>>> also often called a program binary, or binaries (as opposed to the
>>> source code).
>>>
>>
If the binaries are functional independent of different linux
distributions, why would sagemath release binaries for fedora 16,
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 6:43 PM, wrote:
>>> I guess there should be no problem related to security.
>>
>> E.g., they may have different softwares installed, different file
> structures etc.
Binary is a completely functional program without any installer is
also often called a program binary, or
>
> I guess there should be no problem related to security.
>>
>
> It is great to know that sage binary for fedora 16 available in the
sagemath website is safe to use in opensuse 13.1. But would using the
fedora 16 binaries be a problem as opensuse 13.1 (may) have technical
differences from fe
