Hi Ron,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM, rje wrote:
> p.s. Just to make sure there is at least one thing useful in this
> post, I point out a misprint after the word "polynomial" at
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/bordeaux_2008/level_one_forms.html
This is now ticket #6600
http://trac.sagemat
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM, rje wrote:
> p.s. Just to make sure there is at least one thing useful in this
> post, I point out a misprint after the word "polynomial" at
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/bordeaux_2008/level_one_forms.html
You're invited to upload a patch to the trac server. I
It's not so much that I haven't read the documentation, but rather
that the definitions have been unclear.
It's not Sage, it's me--things have been unclear all my life. To
paraphrase from 1969's "Both sides now", I really don't know
"numerical_eigenforms" at all. What Sage calls a cusp form on
2009/7/15 rje :
>
> What is going on here? Does this only work for even weights? rje
>
> sage: n=numerical_eigenforms(15,3);n.ap(2)
> []
>
>
Type
sage: numerical_eigenforms?
and read it. In particular, the first input is the group and if a
number N is given that it just defaults to Gamma0(N).
