On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:48:57 -0500
Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Burcin Erocal wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:35:16 -0500
> > Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> The general request still stands, though: is there a way to
> >> numerically approximate all the constant
On Oct 10, 3:48 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any chance this could be merged into 3.1.3 to get wider
> testing? That is, if it's a purely optional framework. Barring that,
> is there a chance we could get a single huge patch that consolidates all
> of this, or even
Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:35:16 -0500
> Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The general request still stands, though: is there a way to
>> numerically approximate all the constants in a symbolic expression,
>> but keep the variables as variables?
>
> The pynac based s
On Oct 10, 10:02 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Burcin Erocal wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:35:16 -0500
> > Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> The general request still stands, though: is there a way to
> >> numerically approximate all the constants in a symbolic exp
Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:35:16 -0500
> Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The general request still stands, though: is there a way to
>> numerically approximate all the constants in a symbolic expression,
>> but keep the variables as variables?
>
> The pynac based s
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:35:16 -0500
Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The general request still stands, though: is there a way to
> numerically approximate all the constants in a symbolic expression,
> but keep the variables as variables?
The pynac based symbolics code does the following:
William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Jason Grout
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How do I get a numeric approximation for symbolic expressions that have
>> variables? I want to leave the variables alone, but get numeric
>> approximations for all constants. For example, here's
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How do I get a numeric approximation for symbolic expressions that have
> variables? I want to leave the variables alone, but get numeric
> approximations for all constants. For example, here's how it works in
> mathemat
