On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:29 AM, mabshoff
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 20, 4:10 am, tomanizer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> If I remember correctly it took around 14 hours, but my memory might
>> not be reliable.
>
> Ouch.
Holy crud. 14 hours! Gees.
>
>> I will try to build it for the new Sage version and le
On Feb 20, 4:10 am, tomanizer wrote:
Hi,
> If I remember correctly it took around 14 hours, but my memory might
> not be reliable.
Ouch.
> I will try to build it for the new Sage version and let you know how
> long it takes.
Yeah, it needs way too much RAM to build on smaller systems, i.e.
If I remember correctly it took around 14 hours, but my memory might
not be reliable.
I will try to build it for the new Sage version and let you know how
long it takes.
What do we need to do to make QuantLib a supported package?
I am interested in helping, but I am not a Python/Sage genius (yet).
On Feb 19, 2:15 am, tomanizer wrote:
> Hi All,
Hi Thomas,
> I successfully built the experimental QuantLib spkg for Sage 3.0.
> That took quite a while on my slow machine.
Yeah, building the Swing extension of Quantlib is painful.
> You can check it out here:http://highburyplace.no-ip.org:4
