This is a really nasty bug.. Symbolic maxima and minima are
mathematical standard tools, they should at least be _callable_ in
standard sage. One can see the problem this way:
p = var("p")
show( plot(max(p,3),(p,0,10)) )
show( plot(min(p,3),(p,0,10)) )
Could someone please post a quickhack to de
I finally got back to looking at this thread. That does work, though
it breaks calling plot3d with the following format:
max_symbolic=MaxSymbolic()
f(x,y)=sqrt(max_symbolic(9-x^2-y^2,0))
plot3d(f(x,y),(x,-3,3),(y,-3,3))
However
plot3d(f,(-3,3),(-3,3))
works fine. So it's a fine work around.
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
kcrisman wrote:
>
> Might there be a way to do something that doesn't conflict with the
> builtin max function in the same way as the (nearly reviewed) #3587
> seems to avoid conflict with the builtin sum function? This would be
> pretty useful, as curr
Might there be a way to do something that doesn't conflict with the
builtin max function in the same way as the (nearly reviewed) #3587
seems to avoid conflict with the builtin sum function? This would be
pretty useful, as currently:
sage: var('x,y')
(x, y)
sage: max(x,y)
x
sage: f(x)=1+x;g(x)=2
Hi Matt,
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Matt Rissler wrote:
> Is it possible to have max behave as you would expect with a symbolic
> expression, i.e. wait until you evaluate it or restrict the domain to
> check what is the maximum of the two or more values.
Below is a quick implem
