On Apr 8, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>> So this means duplicating the subdivisions part of the general matrix
>> str function for the mod 2 case?
>
> As a first cut, why not use the local str() method unless subdivisions
> are in place. There may be a performance issue in determin
On Apr 8, 2009, at 13:29 , John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> On Apr 8, 1:10 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:06 PM, John H Palmieri
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'll mark mine as a duplicate. Go ahead with your patch.
>>
>> Neither Justin nor I have a patch, and I don't think either of us
On Apr 8, 1:28 pm, gerhard wrote:
> Re show method:
>
> M.subdivide(1,3);
> print M.get_subdivisions()
> show(M)
>
> I get
>
> ([1], [3])
>
> as for the show method output, no subdivisions.
> latex(M) yields
>
> \left(\begin{array}{rrr|r}
> 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 &
> 0
On Apr 8, 1:10 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:06 PM, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
>
> > I'll mark mine as a duplicate. Go ahead with your patch.
>
> Neither Justin nor I have a patch, and I don't think either of us are
> working on one.
Justin posted on his ticket "I'll attac
Re show method:
M.subdivide(1,3);
print M.get_subdivisions()
show(M)
I get
([1], [3])
as for the show method output, no subdivisions.
latex(M) yields
\left(\begin{array}{rrr|r}
1 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 &
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 &
0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 &
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:06 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
>> On Apr 8, 12:56 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Apr 8, 2009, at 12:07 , gerhard wrote:
>>
>> > > Print methods for matrices with subdivisions
>>
>> > > let M be a matrix ov
On Apr 8, 1:03 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Apr 8, 12:56 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 8, 2009, at 12:07 , gerhard wrote:
>
> > > Print methods for matrices with subdivisions
>
> > > let M be a matrix over QQ:
> > > subdivisions are printed fine
> > > over GF(2):
> > >
On Apr 8, 12:56 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2009, at 12:07 , gerhard wrote:
>
> > Print methods for matrices with subdivisions
>
> > let M be a matrix over QQ:
> > subdivisions are printed fine
> > over GF(2):
> > M.get_subdivisions() shows the subdivisions are defined,
> >
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 8, 2009, at 12:07 , gerhard wrote:
>
>> Print methods for matrices with subdivisions
>>
>> let M be a matrix over QQ:
>> subdivisions are printed fine
>> over GF(2):
>> M.get_subdivisions() shows the subdivisions are defi
On Apr 8, 2009, at 12:07 , gerhard wrote:
> Print methods for matrices with subdivisions
>
> let M be a matrix over QQ:
>subdivisions are printed fine
> over GF(2):
>M.get_subdivisions() shows the subdivisions are defined,
>but the print method does not know about them.
Yup. Most m
10 matches
Mail list logo
