Kevin Horton wrote:
> On 21 Apr 2009, at 11:38, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> dpvc wrote:
>>> OK, from the testing that I've done, it looks like this is, indeed,
>>> the problem, and you won't have to do the testing that I suggested.
>>>
>>> It turns out that this problem was fixed in version 3.6b of j
On 21 Apr 2009, at 11:38, Jason Grout wrote:
> dpvc wrote:
>> OK, from the testing that I've done, it looks like this is, indeed,
>> the problem, and you won't have to do the testing that I suggested.
>>
>> It turns out that this problem was fixed in version 3.6b of jsMath,
>> and you are running
dpvc wrote:
> OK, from the testing that I've done, it looks like this is, indeed,
> the problem, and you won't have to do the testing that I suggested.
>
> It turns out that this problem was fixed in version 3.6b of jsMath,
> and you are running 3.6a, so if you download the latest version of
> js
OK, from the testing that I've done, it looks like this is, indeed,
the problem, and you won't have to do the testing that I suggested.
It turns out that this problem was fixed in version 3.6b of jsMath,
and you are running 3.6a, so if you download the latest version of
jsMath and replace the cop
On 21 Apr 2009, at 06:53, dpvc wrote:
> As an experiment, if you could insert the lines
>
>
> jsMath.Autoload = {root: "https://99.240.209.8:8000/"}
>
>
> to the font test HTML file just before the script tag where jsMat
OK, thanks for the detailed description of what is happening. Now
this makes me think that this IS a jsMath bug, and not an improper
image font installation. If the image fonts are working in Firefox,
then they are installed properly.
The error you are getting about jsMath thinking that you are
Kevin Horton wrote:
>
> I am happy with the workaround of using Firefox, so this is only worth
> working on if it may represent a bug, or a problem with the
> installation instructions, etc.
Given that things work fine on sagenb.org, I'll not spend more time on
this, as it sounds like somet
On 20 Apr 2009, at 11:32, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Kevin Horton
> wrote:
>>
>> On 20 Apr 2009, at 10:16, Jason Grout wrote:
>>
>>> dpvc wrote:
> By works correctly, I mean that Firefox displays the nicely
> rendered
> equations, while IE only displa
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> That's because I installed the jsmath-image-fonts-1.3 spkg into
>> sagenb.org's sage install. I have jsmath-image-fonts-1.3 and not
>> jsmath-image-fonts-1.3p1 installed; that could make a difference.
>
>
> Rea
William Stein wrote:
>
> That's because I installed the jsmath-image-fonts-1.3 spkg into
> sagenb.org's sage install. I have jsmath-image-fonts-1.3 and not
> jsmath-image-fonts-1.3p1 installed; that could make a difference.
Really? Are you sure you have jsmath-image-fonts-1.3.spkg installed
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>
> On 20 Apr 2009, at 10:16, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> dpvc wrote:
By works correctly, I mean that Firefox displays the nicely rendered
equations, while IE only displays raw latex code.
>>>
>>> OK, thanks for the clarification. I had
On 20 Apr 2009, at 10:16, Jason Grout wrote:
> dpvc wrote:
>>> By works correctly, I mean that Firefox displays the nicely rendered
>>> equations, while IE only displays raw latex code.
>>
>> OK, thanks for the clarification. I had misunderstood. In Firefox,
>> can you click on the "jsMath" but
dpvc wrote:
>> By works correctly, I mean that Firefox displays the nicely rendered
>> equations, while IE only displays raw latex code.
>
> OK, thanks for the clarification. I had misunderstood. In Firefox,
> can you click on the "jsMath" button in the lower right and tell me
> what font mod
> By works correctly, I mean that Firefox displays the nicely rendered
> equations, while IE only displays raw latex code.
OK, thanks for the clarification. I had misunderstood. In Firefox,
can you click on the "jsMath" button in the lower right and tell me
what font mode is reported next to
On 19 Apr 2009, at 06:54, dpvc wrote:
> I do not think it is a jsMath bug. If I understand you, by "works
> correctly" you mean that Firefox doesn't show the font warning message
> (while IE7 does, which you consider not working correctly). You have
> tried several means of installing the jsMa
I do not think it is a jsMath bug. If I understand you, by "works
correctly" you mean that Firefox doesn't show the font warning message
(while IE7 does, which you consider not working correctly). You have
tried several means of installing the jsMath image fonts as a solution
to this problem.
T
Kevin Horton wrote:
>
> I have made some progress in that I discovered that Firefox 3 works
> correctly on my work PC. It is only IE 7 that has the problems. I
> can live with this, so I will not invest any more time on this issue,
> unless someone wants my assistance to try to beat this
On 18 Apr 2009, at 00:59, Adam Webb wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 18, 12:35 am, Kevin Horton wrote:
>> I am running sage 3.4 on OS X. I get the well known jsmath fonts
>> messages when I try to view a notebook worksheet from my work
>> computer. Our work PCs are so locked down that I cannot install
>
On 18 Apr 2009, at 04:29, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Kevin Horton wrote:
>> I am running sage 3.4 on OS X. I get the well known jsmath fonts
>> messages when I try to view a notebook worksheet from my work
>> computer. Our work PCs are so locked down that I cannot install
>> additional fonts there
Kevin Horton wrote:
> I am running sage 3.4 on OS X. I get the well known jsmath fonts
> messages when I try to view a notebook worksheet from my work
> computer. Our work PCs are so locked down that I cannot install
> additional fonts there, so I need to address this on the server end.
>
> I h
On Apr 18, 12:35 am, Kevin Horton wrote:
> I am running sage 3.4 on OS X. I get the well known jsmath fonts
> messages when I try to view a notebook worksheet from my work
> computer. Our work PCs are so locked down that I cannot install
> additional fonts there, so I need to address this on
21 matches
Mail list logo
