2020 21:18:46 UTC, Karima Shahzad:
>
> Do you recommend Sage-9.2 for the users if they're working with Sage-9.1?
Preliminary release notes to help you decide:
https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.2
Personally I would recommend upgrading to the latest
development version, which has lot
Do you recommend Sage-9.2 for the users if they're working with Sage-9.1?
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 12:54 PM Eric Gourgoulhon
wrote:
> I confirm the issue with the Taylor series with Sage 9.1. Fortunately, the
> bug seems to have been fixed for Sage 9.2. As Emmanuel, I get the correct
> Taylor ser
Le mardi 29 septembre 2020 à 14:27:38 UTC+2, fqgo...@colby.edu a écrit :
> Good news! When is 9.2 expected to be ready?
>
Sage 9.2 should be released within a few weeks (the beta cycle is almost
over and the release candidate cycle should start soon). Meanwhile, you can
take a look at the new f
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 1:36 PM Henri Girard wrote:
>
> Now if you build it :)
>
TBF, building Sage on Windows is less than trivial. :-(
> On 29/09/2020 14:27, Fernando Gouvea wrote:
>
> Good news! When is 9.2 expected to be ready?
>
> Fernando
>
> On 9/29/2020 3:54 AM, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
Now if you build it :)
On 29/09/2020 14:27, Fernando Gouvea wrote:
Good news! When is 9.2 expected to be ready?
Fernando
On 9/29/2020 3:54 AM, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
I confirm the issue with the Taylor series with Sage 9.1.
Fortunately, the bug seems to have been fixed for Sage 9.2. As
Emm
Good news! When is 9.2 expected to be ready?
Fernando
On 9/29/2020 3:54 AM, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
I confirm the issue with the Taylor series with Sage 9.1. Fortunately,
the bug seems to have been fixed for Sage 9.2. As Emmanuel, I get the
correct Taylor series with Sage 9.2.beta13.
Le mard
I'm running Sage 9.0 on a Windows 10 machine.
I get the same incorrect series from the built-in sin_integral function,
so the problem is not the integration.
sage: taylor(sin_integral(x),x,0,10)
73/466560*x^9 - 127/35280*x^7 + 31/600*x^5 - 7/18*x^3 + x
Fernando
On 9/29/2020 3:36 AM, Emmanuel
I confirm the issue with the Taylor series with Sage 9.1. Fortunately, the
bug seems to have been fixed for Sage 9.2. As Emmanuel, I get the correct
Taylor series with Sage 9.2.beta13.
Le mardi 29 septembre 2020 à 09:36:09 UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
> I can’t reproduce your problem
I can’t reproduce your problem :
sage: sage.version.version
'9.2.beta13'
sage: var('t')
t
sage: assume(x>0)
sage: f(x)=integrate(sin(t)/t,t,0,x)
sage: f
x |--> sin_integral(x)
sage: taylor(f(x),x,0,10)
1/3265920*x^9 - 1/35280*x^7 + 1/600*x^5 - 1/18*x^3 + x
My platform is Debian testing running
