[sage-support] Re: installation under snow leopard

2010-10-23 Thread Ferren
Success. I logged in under my other name, and sage compiled. No idea why, but I'm happy. Thanks for the hand-holding: I learned a bit more about Unix. Now to explore Sage. --Ferren On Oct 23, 8:46 am, Ferren wrote: > OK, distinct signs of progress. The root password remains mysterious; > the

[sage-support] Re: installation under snow leopard

2010-10-22 Thread Ferren
OK, distinct signs of progress. The root password remains mysterious; the login password is under control; and the .sage directory now seems pretty accessible: dispo-82-248-128-135:~ ferrenmacintyre$ cd .sage/ dispo-82-248-128-135:.sage ferrenmacintyre$ ls -l total 0 drwxrwxr-x 2 root admin 6

Re: [sage-support] Re: installation under snow leopard

2010-10-22 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 10/23/10 12:51 AM, Michael Welsh wrote: The root password doesn't work with sudo, you need to login as "su" (just type that) first. However, sudo is much easier. HTH, Michael In general there is no user called "su", so one can't log in as "su". su is a command to 'switch user'. By defau

Re: [sage-support] Re: installation under snow leopard

2010-10-22 Thread Michael Welsh
On 23/10/2010, at 12:07 PM, Ferren wrote: > Now, in addition to any Unix-related problems, I may have an > idiosyncratic Mac problem. When my Mac guru put Snow Leopard on it > (while he was repairing the permissions problem), he set me up with no > password for my user account. This appears to be

[sage-support] Re: installation under snow leopard

2010-10-22 Thread Ferren
On Oct 21, 4:32 pm, kcrisman wrote: > On Oct 21, 2:53 am, Ferren wrote: > > > Good point. However, I copied the version number from the README file, > > which says 10.4, because copying from the DMG is messier. The DMG > > claims to be 10.6. > > Then I'm REALLY glad we are changing the README i

[sage-support] Re: installation under snow leopard

2010-10-21 Thread kcrisman
On Oct 21, 2:53 am, Ferren wrote: > Good point. However, I copied the version number from the README file, > which says 10.4, because copying from the DMG is messier. The DMG > claims to be 10.6. Then I'm REALLY glad we are changing the README in the next release! That file just gives a hypothe

[sage-support] Re: installation under snow leopard

2010-10-20 Thread Ferren
Good point. However, I copied the version number from the README file, which says 10.4, because copying from the DMG is messier. The DMG claims to be 10.6. I also have installed XCode 3.2, with GCC 4.2.1 build 5646, which may help. For obscure reasons the XCode installation complained about a coup

[sage-support] Re: installation under snow leopard

2010-10-20 Thread Marshall Hampton
Yes, as David points out, you definitely want the 10.6 binary: sage-4.5.3-OSX-64bit-10.6-i386-Darwin.dmg -M. Hampton On Oct 20, 12:44 pm, David Joyner wrote: > But 10.4 is not snow leopard. I think 10.4 is tiger. > Did you also try downloading and installing the 10.6 version? > > On Wed, Oct 20