On Nov 30, 2008, at 12:37 , Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
>> Here's another example:
>> 64-bit:
>> sage: time a = random_matrix(ZZ,200).determinant()
>> CPU times: user 2.74 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 2.75 s
>>
>> 32-bit:
>> sage: time a = random_matrix(ZZ,200).determinant()
>> CPU times: user 0.74 s, sy
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:50 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 30, 12:40 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Martin Albrecht
>>
>>
>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >> Here's another example:
>> >> 64-bit:
>> >> sage: time
On Sunday 30 November 2008, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Martin Albrecht
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Here's another example:
> >> 64-bit:
> >> sage: time a = random_matrix(ZZ,200).determinant()
> >> CPU times: user 2.74 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 2.75 s
> >>
> >> 32
On Nov 30, 12:40 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Martin Albrecht
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Here's another example:
> >> 64-bit:
> >> sage: time a = random_matrix(ZZ,200).determinant()
> >> CPU times: user 2.74 s, sys: 0.01 s, tot
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Martin Albrecht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Here's another example:
>> 64-bit:
>> sage: time a = random_matrix(ZZ,200).determinant()
>> CPU times: user 2.74 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 2.75 s
>>
>> 32-bit:
>> sage: time a = random_matrix(ZZ,200).determinant()
>> CP
> Here's another example:
> 64-bit:
> sage: time a = random_matrix(ZZ,200).determinant()
> CPU times: user 2.74 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 2.75 s
>
> 32-bit:
> sage: time a = random_matrix(ZZ,200).determinant()
> CPU times: user 0.74 s, sys: 0.04 s, total: 0.78 s
>
> Here, surprisingly, 64-bit is WAY
Thanks for the information. Yes, indeed I'm thinking of buying a
machine and most likely the OS will be linux.
All I can tell is that running SAGE on a Windows machine (via
VMware Player) is pretty slow. The CPU on my laptop is an Intel Core 2
Duo U7600 and
timeit('factorial(10^6)') sh
On Nov 29, 2008, at 11:47 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Nov 29, 11:37 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>> On Nov 29, 2008, at 07:35 , pong wrote:
>>
Hi,
>>
I wonder if SAGE is optimized for multi-core CUPs (people
told me
that many programs don't).
>>
>>> Thi
On Nov 29, 11:37 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2008, at 11:26 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
>
Hi,
> > On Nov 29, 2008, at 07:35 , pong wrote:
>
> >> Hi,
>
> >> I wonder if SAGE is optimized for multi-core CUPs (people told me
> >> that many programs don't).
>
>> Also, does it matter (in term of speed)
>> that SAGE is running on a 64-bit OS vs 32-bit?
>This is not an easy question to answer. Sage is built from many
> components that were not specifically designed with Sage or
> multiprocessor issues in mind.
This is a subtle question indeed. The ques
On Nov 29, 2008, at 11:37 , Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2008, at 11:26 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
>> On Nov 29, 2008, at 07:35 , pong wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>I wonder if SAGE is optimized for multi-core CUPs (people told me
>>> that many programs don't).
[snip]
>
> One importan
On Nov 29, 2008, at 11:26 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2008, at 07:35 , pong wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wonder if SAGE is optimized for multi-core CUPs (people told me
>> that many programs don't).
>
> This is not an easy question to answer. Sage is built from many
> components that
On Nov 29, 2008, at 07:35 , pong wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if SAGE is optimized for multi-core CUPs (people told me
> that many programs don't).
This is not an easy question to answer. Sage is built from many
components that were not specifically designed with Sage or
multiprocessor
On Nov 29, 2008, at 7:35 AM, pong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if SAGE is optimized for multi-core CUPs (people told me
> that many programs don't).
Sage has many components. Some of them can take advantage of multiple
cores, but there's still a lot of work to do in that direction. There
i
14 matches
Mail list logo