On Tue, 26 May 2015, kcrisman wrote:
But as has been pointed out on some relatively recent ticket,
graphics_array needs an overhaul in any case and thus needs someone with
the time and expertise to do that. Should you have that time I would be
very happy to review!
Uh, no. I know about not
>
> In general: should graphics_array work something like decorator pattern,
> so that it would have .plot() function and one could even combine arrays
> to bigger ones?
>
>
Perhaps! But as has been pointed out on some relatively recent ticket,
graphics_array needs an overhaul in any case and
On Fri, 22 May 2015, kcrisman wrote:
This prints "Another funcion" but not "Some funcion". Is this a bug or
a feature?
Almost certainly related to http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10657
Thanks. This is where I actually noticed this:
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18471
In general: should
>
>
> This prints "Another funcion" but not "Some funcion". Is this a bug or a
> feature?
>
>
Almost certainly related to http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10657
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group an
